Inbred mouse strains C57BL/6J and DBA/2J vary in sensitivity to a subset of bitter stimuli

被引:50
作者
Boughter, JD [1 ]
Raghow, S
Nelson, TM
Munger, SD
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Program Neurosci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2156-6-36
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Common inbred mouse strains are genotypically diverse, but it is still poorly understood how this diversity relates to specific differences in behavior. To identify quantitative trait genes that influence taste behavior differences, it is critical to utilize assays that exclusively measure the contribution of orosensory cues. With a few exceptions, previous characterizations of behavioral taste sensitivity in inbred mouse strains have generally measured consumption, which can be confounded by post-ingestive effects. Here, we used a taste-salient brief-access procedure to measure taste sensitivity to eight stimuli characterized as bitter or aversive in C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice. Results: B6 mice were more sensitive than D2 mice to a subset of bitter stimuli, including quinine hydrochloride (QHCl), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), and MgCl2. D2 mice were more sensitive than B6 mice to the bitter stimulus raffinose undecaacetate (RUA). These strains did not differ in sensitivity to cycloheximide (CYX), denatonium benzoate (DB), KCl or HCl. Conclusion: B6-D2 taste sensitivity differences indicate that differences in consumption of QHCl, PROP, MgCl2 and RUA are based on immediate orosensory cues, not post-ingestive effects. The absence of a strain difference for CYX suggests that polymorphisms in a T2R-type taste receptor shown to be differentially sensitive to CYX in vitro are unlikely to differentially contribute to the CYX behavioral response in vivo. The results of these studies point to the utility of these common mouse strains and their associated resources for investigation into the genetic mechanisms of taste.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[31]   Quantitative trait loci affecting initial sensitivity and acute functional tolerance to ethanol-induced ataxia and brain cAMP signaling in BXD recombinant inbred mice [J].
Kirstein, SL ;
Davidson, KL ;
Ehringer, MA ;
Sikela, JM ;
Erwin, VG ;
Tabakoff, B .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 302 (03) :1238-1245
[32]   Measuring gustatory variation in mice: A short-term fluid-intake test [J].
Kotlus, BS ;
Blizard, DA .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 64 (01) :37-47
[33]   The neural differentiation gene Mash-1 has a distinct pattern of expression from the taste reception-related genes gustducin and T1R2 in the taste buds [J].
Kusakabe, Y ;
Miura, H ;
Hashimoto, R ;
Sugiyama, C ;
Ninomiya, Y ;
Hino, A .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2002, 27 (05) :445-451
[34]   Complex trait analysis of the hippocampus: Mapping and biometric analysis of two novel gene loci with specific effects on hippocampal structure in mice [J].
Lu, L ;
Airey, DC ;
Williams, RW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 21 (10) :3503-3514
[35]   THE GENETICS OF TASTING IN MICE .5. GLYCINE AND CYCLOHEXIMIDE [J].
LUSH, IE ;
HOLLAND, G .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1988, 52 (03) :207-212
[37]   THE GENETICS OF TASTING IN MICE .3. QUININE [J].
LUSH, IE .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 44 (02) :151-160
[38]   THE GENETICS OF TASTING IN MICE .1. SUCROSE OCTAACETATE [J].
LUSH, IE .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1981, 38 (01) :93-95
[39]   THE GENETICS OF TASTING IN MICE .7. GLYCINE REVISITED, AND THE CHROMOSOMAL LOCATION OF SAC AND SOA [J].
LUSH, IE ;
HORNIGOLD, N ;
KING, P ;
STOYE, JP .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 66 (02) :167-174
[40]   A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse [J].
Matsunami, H ;
Montmayeur, JP ;
Buck, LB .
NATURE, 2000, 404 (6778) :601-+