Biomechanical studies of an artificial disc implant in the human cadaveric spine

被引:35
作者
Hitchon, PW
Eichholz, K
Barry, C
Rubenbauer, P
Ingalhalikar, A
Nakamura, S
Follett, K
Lim, TH
Torner, J
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Neurosurg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Prevent Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
artificial disc; spinal biomechanics; discectomy; cadaver;
D O I
10.3171/spi.2005.2.3.0339
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The authors compared the biomechanical performance of the human cadaveric spine implanted with a metallic ball-and-cup artificial disc at L4-5 with the spine's intact state and after anterior discectomy. Methods. Seven human L2-S1 cadaveric spines were mounted on a biomechanical testing frame. Pure moments of 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 Nm were applied to the spine at L-2 in six degrees of motion (flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation). The spines were tested in the intact state as well as after anterior L4-5 discectomy. The Maverick disc was implanted in the discectomy defect, and load testing was repeated. The artificial disc created greater rigidity for the spine than was present after discectomy, and the spine performed biomechanically in a manner comparable with the intact state. Conclusions. The results indicate that in an in vitro setting, this model of artificial disc stabilizes the spine after discectomy, restoring motion comparable with that of the intact state.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 343
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications [J].
Bertagnoli, R ;
Kumar, S .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (Suppl 2) :S131-S136
[2]
BIOMECHANICS OF THE SB CHARITE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL-DISK ENDOPROSTHESIS [J].
BUTTNERJANZ, K ;
SCHELLNACK, K ;
ZIPPEL, H .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1989, 13 (03) :173-176
[3]
Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years [J].
Cinotti, G ;
David, T ;
Postacchini, F .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (08) :995-1000
[4]
COMPARISON OF IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO ADJACENT SEGMENT MOTION AFTER LUMBAR FUSION [J].
DEKUTOSKI, MB ;
SCHENDEL, MJ ;
OGILVIE, JW ;
OLSEWSKI, JM ;
WALLACE, LJ ;
LEWIS, JL .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (15) :1745-1751
[5]
DICKMAN CA, 1994, SPINE, V19, pS2266
[6]
ARTIFICIAL DISC REPLACEMENT - PRELIMINARY-REPORT WITH A 3-YEAR MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ENKER, P ;
STEFFEE, A ;
MCMILLIN, C ;
KEPPLER, L ;
BISCUP, R ;
MILLER, S .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (08) :1061-1070
[7]
Biomechanical behaviour of a prosthetic lumbar nucleus [J].
Eysel, P ;
Rompe, JD ;
Schoenmayr, R ;
Zoellner, J .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1999, 141 (10) :1083-1087
[8]
Fernstrom U, 1966, Acta Chir Scand Suppl, V357, P154
[9]
GOEL VK, 1990, BIOMECHANICS SPINE C, P97
[10]
A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE CLINICAL-RESULTS OF THE LIN(R) SB CHARITE INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS - THE INITIAL EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE [J].
GRIFFITH, SL ;
SHELOKOV, AP ;
BUTTNERJANZ, K ;
LEMAIRE, JP ;
ZEEGERS, WS .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (16) :1842-1849