A double-blind comparison of 0.125% ropivacaine with sufentanil and 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia

被引:69
作者
Gautier, P
De Kock, M
Van Steenberge, A
Fanard, L
Hody, JL
机构
[1] Clin Univ St Luc, Dept Anesthesiol, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Clin St Anne St Remi, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
local anesthetic; obstetric; side effects;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199903000-00020
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background This study intends to evaluate the benefits of the administration of intermittent bolus doses of ropivacaine (0.125%) compared with bupivacaine (0.125%) after addition of sufentanil for analgesia during labor. Methods: One hundred thirty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2 parturients were studied. The 90 initial patients were assigned randomly to receive 10 mi bupivacaine, 0.125%, plus 7.5 mu g sufentanil (initial bupivacaine 0.125% group) or ropivacaine, 0.125%, plus 7.5 mu g sufentanil (ropivacaine 0.125% group). Forty additional patients were recruited and received 0.125% bupivacaine plus 7.5 mu g sufentanil (additional bupivacaine 0.125% group) or 0.100% bupivacaine plus 7.5 pg sufentanil (additional bupivacaine 0.100% group). The duration of analgesia, visual analogue scores for pain, motor blockade (using a six-point modified Bromage scale), patient satisfaction scores, nausea, pruritus, heart rate, and blood pressure were recorded. Results: Bupivacaine 0.125% and ropivacaine 0.125% coadministered with sufentanil provided rapid and complete analgesia. Onset of analgesia occurred after +/- 15 min and lasted +/- 90 min. After the third epidural injection, patients in the ropivacaine group experienced significantly less severe motor blockade than patients in the initial bupivacaine 0.125% group. At this point, 93% of the patients in the ropivacaine group were free from motor impairment versus 66% in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.05). Comparable levels of motor blockade were obtained in both additional groups. Patients' evaluation of their analgesia was worst in the bupivacaine 0.100% group. Conclusions: Ropivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil affords reliable analgesia with minimal motor blockade.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 778
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) for pain relief during labour [J].
Benhamou, D ;
Hamza, J ;
Eledjam, JJ ;
Dailland, P ;
Palot, M ;
Seebacher, J ;
Milon, D ;
Heeroma, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (06) :748-750
[2]  
BREEN TW, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P919
[3]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[4]   EXTRADURAL ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF 0.5-PERCENT ROPIVACAINE WITH 0.5-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE [J].
GRIFFIN, RP ;
REYNOLDS, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (05) :512-516
[5]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF EXTRADURAL FENTANYL IN LABOR [J].
JUSTINS, DM ;
FRANCIS, D ;
HOULTON, PG ;
REYNOLDS, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 54 (04) :409-414
[6]   Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers [J].
Knudsen, K ;
Suurkula, MB ;
Blomberg, S ;
Sjovall, J ;
Edvardsson, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (05) :507-514
[7]   Ropivacaine [J].
McClure, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (02) :300-307
[8]   COMPARISON OF ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE IN EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA FOR THE RELIEF OF PAIN IN LABOR [J].
MCCRAE, AF ;
JOZWIAK, H ;
MCCLURE, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (03) :261-265
[9]  
MEISTER G, 1998, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V88, pA5
[10]   Double-blind comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25%, for the relief of childbirth pain [J].
Muir, HA ;
Writer, D ;
Douglas, J ;
Weeks, S ;
Gambling, D ;
Macarthur, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (06) :599-604