The sensitivity of dose distributions for organ motion and set-up uncertainties in prostate IMRT

被引:45
作者
Bos, LJ [1 ]
van der Geer, J [1 ]
van Herk, M [1 ]
Mijnheer, BJ [1 ]
Lebesque, JV [1 ]
Damen, EMF [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
uncertainties; organ motion; set-up; IMRT; prostate;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: To determine the effect of organ motion and set-up uncertainties on IMRT dose distributions for prostate. Methods: For five patients, IMRT techniques were designed to irradiate the CTV (prostate plus seminal vesicles). Technique I delivered 78 Gy to PTV1 (CTV+ 10 mm margin). Technique II delivered 68 Gy to PTV1, and a 10 Gy boost to PTV2 (CTV+an anisotropic margin of 0 to 5 mm). Technique III delivered 68 Gy to PTV1 and simultaneously 78 Gy to PTV2. Uncertainties were simulated using population statistics of organ motion and set-up accuracy. The average TCP (TCPpop) of the CTV and average NTCP (NTCPpop) of the rectal wall were calculated. Results: The planning TCP was a good predictor for TCPpop for Techniques I and II. Technique III was sensitive for geometrical uncertainties, reducing TCPpop by 0.8 to 2.4% compared to planning. NTCPpop was reduced for Technique III by a factor 2.6 compared to Technique I. For all plans, the planning NTCP was strongly correlated with NTCPpop. Conclusions: Dose distributions created with Techniques I and II are insensitive for geometrical uncertainties, while Technique III resulted in a reduction of TCPpop. This reduction can be compensated by a small dose escalation, while still resulting in an NTCPpop of the rectal wall that is lower or comparable to Technique I. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ALBER M, 2000, INT C US COMP RAD TH, V13, P46
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 62 ICRU
[3]   Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: Implications for treatment planning [J].
Beard, CJ ;
Kijewski, P ;
Bussiere, M ;
Gelman, R ;
Gladstone, D ;
Shaffer, K ;
Plunkett, M ;
Costello, P ;
Coleman, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (02) :451-458
[4]   Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy [J].
Bel, A ;
vanHerk, M ;
Lebesque, JV .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (09) :1537-1545
[5]   A VERIFICATION PROCEDURE TO IMPROVE PATIENT SET-UP ACCURACY USING PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BEL, A ;
VANHERK, M ;
BARTELINK, H ;
LEBESQUE, JV .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (02) :253-260
[6]   Comparison between manual and automatic segment generation in step-and-shoot IMRT of prostate cancer [J].
Bos, LJ ;
Schwarz, M ;
Bär, W ;
Alber, M ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
Lebesque, JV ;
Damen, EMF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (01) :122-130
[7]   Reduction of rectal dose by integration of the boost in the large-field treatment plan for prostate irradiation [J].
Bos, LJ ;
Damen, EMF ;
de Boer, RW ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
McShan, DL ;
Fraass, BA ;
Kessler, ML ;
Lebesque, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (01) :254-265
[8]  
*BRIT I RAD WORK P, 2003, GEOM UNC RAD
[9]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[10]   Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: A new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy [J].
Butler, EB ;
Teh, BS ;
Grant, WH ;
Uhl, BM ;
Kuppersmith, RB ;
Chiu, JK ;
Donovan, DT ;
Woo, SY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (01) :21-32