The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:58
作者
Chang, CM [1 ]
Moon, D [1 ]
Gianduzzo, TR [1 ]
Eden, CG [1 ]
机构
[1] N Hampshire Hosp, Dept Urol, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, Hants, England
关键词
prostate cancer; prostatectomy; laparoscopic surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Large prostates can be challenging to remove during open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our objective was to critically analyse the impact of prostate volume in LRP. Methods: 400 cases of LRP were performed. Three hundred and fourteen patients had a small prostate (weight < 75 g) and 86 patients had a large prostate (weight >= 75 g) on final histology. The following outcomes were assessed: operative time; estimated blood loss (EBL); transfusion rate; length of hospital stay (LOS); length of catheterisation; perioperative and postoperative complications (including incontinence and erectile dysfunction); surgical margin status; and early biochemical recurrence rates. Results: Patients' age, PSA, Gleason sum and clinical stage were all similar. Larger prostates were associated with a 14 minutes longer mean operating time (p < 0.001), but fewer positive surgical margins (p = 0.01). Blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, length of catheterisation and complication rate were all similar in both groups. Conclusions: Prostate size should not be a factor determining a patient's suitability for LRP. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect of prostate size on long-term functional and oncological results. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 290
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technique [J].
Gill, IS ;
Zippe, CD .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (02) :423-+
[12]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Barret, E ;
Rozet, F ;
Vallancien, G .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 36 (01) :14-20
[13]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
El-Fettouh, H ;
Baumert, H ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Doublet, JD ;
Fromont, G ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) :1261-1266
[14]   Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Hsu, EI ;
Hong, EK ;
Lepor, H .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (03) :601-606
[15]   Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume [J].
Karakiewicz, PI ;
Bazinet, M ;
Aprikian, AG ;
Trudel, C ;
Aronson, S ;
Nachabe, M ;
Peloquint, F ;
Dessureault, J ;
Goyal, MS ;
Begin, LR ;
Elhilali, MM .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (01) :55-59
[16]   Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases [J].
Lepor, H ;
Nieder, AM ;
Ferrandino, MN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1729-1733
[17]   Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy [J].
Myers, RP .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) :473-+
[18]   Recent trends in the use of radical prostatectomy in England: the epidemiology of diffusion [J].
Oliver, SE ;
Donovan, JL ;
Peters, TJ ;
Frankel, S ;
Hamdy, FC ;
Neal, DE .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 91 (04) :331-336
[19]   BLOOD-TRANSFUSION AND ANESTHETIC PRACTICES IN RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
PETERS, CA ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1985, 134 (01) :81-83
[20]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:: Prospective evaluation of the learning curve [J].
Poulakis, V ;
Dillenburg, W ;
Moeckel, M ;
de Vries, R ;
Witzsch, U ;
Zumbé, J ;
Rassweiler, J ;
Becht, E .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (02) :167-175