The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach

被引:42
作者
Serenko, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Fac Business Adm, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Journal ranking; Academic journal; Google scholar; Citation impact; h-Index; g-Index; hc-Index; H-INDEX; CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; GLOBAL PERCEPTIONS; BUSINESS; QUALITY; IMPACT; SCIENCE; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study presents a ranking of 182 academic journals in the field of artificial intelligence. For this, the revealed preference approach, also referred to as a citation impact method, was utilized to collect data from Google Scholar. This list was developed based on three relatively novel indices: h-index, g-index, and hc-index. These indices correlated almost perfectly with one another (ranging from 0.97 to 0.99), and they correlated strongly with Thomson's Journal Impact Factors (ranging from 0.64 to 0.69). It was concluded that journal longevity (years in print) is an important but not the only factor affecting an outlet's ranking position. Inclusion in Thomson's Journal Citation Reports is a must for a journal to be identified as a leading A+ or A level outlet. However, coverage by Thomson does not guarantee a high citation impact of an outlet. The presented list may be utilized by scholars who want to demonstrate their research output, various academic committees, librarians and administrators who are not familiar with the AI research domain. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 459
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]   An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output [J].
Hirsch, JE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) :16569-16572
[32]  
Holsapple C. W., 1994, Journal of Management Information Systems, V11, P131
[33]   A publication power approach for identifying premier information systems journals [J].
Holsapple, Clyde W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (02) :166-185
[34]   A New Map for Knowledge Dissemination Channels [J].
Holsapple, Clyde W. .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2009, 52 (03) :117-125
[35]   AN EMPIRICAL-ASSESSMENT AND CATEGORIZATION OF JOURNALS RELEVANT TO DSS RESEARCH [J].
HOLSAPPLE, CW ;
JOHNSON, LE ;
MANAKYAN, H ;
TANNER, J .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1995, 14 (04) :359-367
[36]   INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTIVITY AND IMPACT IN DEVELOPMENTAL-PSYCHOLOGY [J].
HOWARD, GS ;
DAY, JD .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1995, 15 (02) :136-149
[37]   Measuring the quality of publications: new methodology and case study [J].
Kleijnen, JPC ;
Van Groenendaal, W .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2000, 36 (04) :551-570
[38]   Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis [J].
Kousha, Kayvan ;
Thelwall, Mike .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (07) :1055-1065
[39]   A scientometric investigation into the validity of IS journal quality measures [J].
Lewis, Bruce R. ;
Templeton, Gary F. ;
Luo, Xin .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 8 (12) :619-633
[40]   h-index sequence and h-index matrix:: Constructions and applications [J].
Liang, Liming .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 69 (01) :153-159