Optimizing precision of rotating-analyzer and rotating-compensator-ellipsometers

被引:34
作者
Aspnes, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Phys, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1364/JOSAA.21.000403
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
I investigate the dependence of shot-noise-limited uncertainties of the ellipsometric parameters psi and Delta for the rotating-analyzer ellipsometer (RAE) and the rotating-compensator ellipsometer (RCE) of the polarizer-sample-compensator-analyzer type. The development is general and takes into account correlations among the Fourier coefficients of the transmitted intensity, in particular the average intensity, which is necessarily correlated with all other coefficients through normalization. The results are expressed in terms of the traditional uncertainties deltapsi and deltaDelta of the ellipsometric parameters psi and Delta, respectively, although a more appropriate measure of uncertainty is the differential area 2deltapsi x sin psideltaDelta on the unit-radius Poincare sphere. Numerical results for broadband operation from 1.5 to 6.0 eV with a Si sample show that the optimum measurement conditions for both configurations occur when the intensity of light reflected from the sample is approximately balanced between the TE and the TM modes, and, for the RCE, when the analyzer azimuth is essentially equal to that of the polarizer. Under typical broadband operating conditions in which components cannot be optimized on a wavelength-by-wavelength basis, the RCE is better at determining Delta, whereas the RAE is better at determining psi. The approach is easily generalized to other configurations and other types of experimental uncertainty, both random and systematic. (C) 2004 Optical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 410
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Aspnes D. E., 1973, Optics Communications, V8, P222, DOI 10.1016/0030-4018(73)90132-6
[2]   OPTIMIZING PRECISION OF ROTATING-ANALYZER ELLIPSOMETERS [J].
ASPNES, DE .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 64 (05) :639-646
[3]   DIELECTRIC FUNCTIONS AND OPTICAL-PARAMETERS OF SI, GE, GAP, GAAS, GASB, INP, INAS, AND INSB FROM 1.5 TO 6.0 EV [J].
ASPNES, DE ;
STUDNA, AA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1983, 27 (02) :985-1009
[4]  
Azzam R.M.A., 1977, Ellipsometry and Polarized Light
[5]   REFRACTIVE PROPERTIES OF MAGNESIUM FLUORIDE [J].
DODGE, MJ .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1984, 23 (12) :1980-1985
[6]   PHASE-MODULATED ELLIPSOMETRY FROM THE ULTRAVIOLET TO THE INFRARED - IN-SITU APPLICATION TO THE GROWTH OF SEMICONDUCTORS [J].
DREVILLON, B .
PROGRESS IN CRYSTAL GROWTH AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MATERIALS, 1993, 27 (01) :1-87
[7]   DESIGN AND OPERATION OF ETA, AN AUTOMATED ELLIPSOMETER [J].
HAUGE, PS ;
DILL, FH .
IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1973, 17 (06) :472-489
[8]   Optimizing precision of fixed-polarizer, rotating-polarizer, sample, and fixed-analyzer spectroscopic ellipsometry [J].
Huang, ZM ;
Chu, JH .
APPLIED OPTICS, 2000, 39 (34) :6390-6395
[9]   Two-modulator generalized ellipsometry: theory [J].
Jellison, GE ;
Modine, FA .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1997, 36 (31) :8190-8198
[10]   A photoelectric method for the determination of the parameters of elliptically polarized light [J].
Kent, CV ;
Lawson, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1937, 27 (03) :117-119