Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making: Extensive Thinking Without Effort

被引:120
作者
Betsch, Tilmann [1 ]
Gloeckner, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erfurt, Dept Psychol, D-99089 Erfurt, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Res Collect Goods, Bonn, Germany
关键词
PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION; RECOGNITION INFORMATION; UNCONSCIOUS THOUGHT; LINEAR JUDGMENT; EXPECTED VALUE; MODEL; PREFERENCES; CONSISTENCY; DISTORTION; COHERENCE;
D O I
10.1080/1047840X.2010.517737
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We claim that intuition is capable of quickly processing multiple pieces of information without noticeable cognitive effort. We advocate a component view stating that intuitive processes in judgment and decision making are responsible for information integration and output formation (e.g., preference, choice), whereas analytic thinking mainly guides input formation such as search, generation, and change of information. We present empirical evidence corroborating this notion and show that integration of information and preference formation works without cognitive control and is unconstrained by the amount of encoded information and cognitive capacity. We discuss the implications of our findings for the bounded rationality perspective and the multiple strategy approach to judgment and decision making. Finally we outline a connectionist framework for integrating intuitive and analytic thought processes.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 294
页数:16
相关论文
共 101 条
[41]   An Eye-tracking Study on Information Processing in Risky Decisions: Evidence for Compensatory Strategies Based on Automatic Processes [J].
Gloeckner, Andreas ;
Herbold, Ann-Katrin .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2011, 24 (01) :71-98
[42]   Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making [J].
Gloeckner, Andreas ;
Witteman, Cilia .
THINKING & REASONING, 2010, 16 (01) :1-25
[43]  
Glöckner A, 2009, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V4, P186
[44]   Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic [J].
Goldstein, DG ;
Gigerenzer, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2002, 109 (01) :75-90
[45]  
Goldstein W.M., 1997, RES JUDGMENT DECISIO, P3
[46]   Save Angels Perhaps:: A critical examination of Unconscious Thought Theory and the deliberation-without-attention effect [J].
Gonzalez-Vallejo, Claudia ;
Lassiter, G. Daniel ;
Bellezza, Francis S. ;
Lindberg, Matthew J. .
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 12 (03) :282-296
[47]   DIRECT COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF INTUITIVE AND ANALYTICAL COGNITION IN EXPERT JUDGMENT [J].
HAMMOND, KR ;
HAMM, RM ;
GRASSIA, J ;
PEARSON, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1987, 17 (05) :753-770
[48]   Ignorance- Versus Evidence-Based Decision Making: A Decision Time Analysis of the Recognition Heuristic [J].
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Pohl, Ruediger F. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (05) :1296-1305
[49]  
Hochman G, 2010, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V5, P285
[50]  
Holyoak K., 1991, Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits