Limited pelvic lymphadenectomy using the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with localised prostate carcinoma: a pilot study

被引:36
作者
Brenot-Rossi, I
Bastide, C
Garcia, S
Dumas, S
Esterni, B
Pasquier, J
Rossi, D
机构
[1] Univ Mediterranee, Reg Canc Ctr, Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, F-13273 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Mediterranee, CHU Nord, Hosp Univ Marseille, Dept Urol, Marseille, France
[3] Univ Mediterranee, CHU Nord, Hosp Univ Marseille, Dept Pathol, Marseille, France
[4] Univ Mediterranee, Reg Canc Ctr, Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, Dept Radiol, Marseille, France
[5] Univ Mediterranee, Reg Canc Ctr, Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, Dept Stat, Marseille, France
关键词
sentinel lymph node; lymphoscintigraphy; lymph node dissection; prostatic carcinoma; prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-004-1750-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in limited lymph node dissection in patients with apparently localised prostate carcinoma. Methods: In 27 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer, a single injection of 0.3 ml/30 MBq Tc-99m-rhenium sulphur colloid was injected transrectally into the peripheral zone of each lobe of the prostate (total 0.6 ml/60 MBq) under ultrasound guidance. Two hours after injection, scintigraphy was performed. The first step in surgery was the detection and dissection of lymph nodes identified as SLNs. Then, standard lymphadenectomy was performed, consisting in a limited dissection that included all lymph nodes from the obturator fossa and along the external iliac vein. Lymphatic tissue along the hypogastric artery was not systematically removed, except in the presence of SLNs. Results: Mean patient age was 66 years (48-77); the mean serum prostate-specific antigen value was 10.6 ng/ml. In a high proportion of patients (21/27, 77.8%) an SLN was located along the initial centimetres of the hypogastric artery. The second most frequent site of SLNs was in the obturator fossa (11/27 patients, 40.7%), followed by the external iliac area (5/27 patients, 18.5%). Four patients had lymph node metastases, all in SLNs: two in the hypogastric area and two in the obturator fossa. Conclusion: The SLN procedure revealed the individual variability in the lymphatic drainage of the prostate. The main site of SLNs was the hypogastric area, and two of the four metastatic nodes were located at this site. A limited standard pelvic lymphadenectomy, excluding the hypogastric lymph nodes, would have missed half of the lymph node metastases in this study. A radionuclide SLN procedure could assist in the correct staging of patients with early prostate cancer, especially when performing limited lymphadenectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 640
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM JOINT COMM CAN, 2002, CANC STAG HDB TNM CL
[2]   Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) :514-518
[3]  
Brössner C, 2002, BJU INT, V89, P44
[4]   Lymphatic drainage of prostatic transition and peripheral zones visualized on a three-dimensional workstation [J].
Brössner, C ;
Ringhofer, H ;
Hernady, T ;
Kuber, W ;
Madersbacher, S ;
Pycha, A .
UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (02) :389-393
[5]   Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection [J].
Burkhard, FC ;
Bader, P ;
Schneider, E ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 42 (02) :84-90
[6]   OPEN PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A REASSESSMENT [J].
CAMPBELL, SC ;
KLEIN, EA ;
LEVIN, HS ;
PIEDMONTE, MR .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) :352-355
[7]   Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Clark, T ;
Parekh, DJ ;
Cookson, MS ;
Chang, SS ;
Smith, ER ;
Wells, N ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) :145-147
[8]   Evaluation of staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer [J].
El-Galley, RES ;
Keane, TE ;
Petros, JA ;
Sanders, WH ;
Clarke, HS ;
Cotsonis, GA ;
Graham, SD .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) :663-667
[9]   Comparison of clinically nonpalpable prostate-specific antigen-detected (cT1c) versus palpable (cT2) prostate cancers in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Ghavamian, R ;
Blute, ML ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Slezak, J ;
Zincke, H .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (01) :105-110
[10]   Validation of a biopsy-based pathologic algorithm for predicting lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma - Impact on changing treatment modalities [J].
Haese, A ;
Epstein, JI ;
Huland, H ;
Partin, AW .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (05) :1016-1021