Evidence of a role for T-box genes in the evolution of limb morphogenesis and the specification of forelimb/hindlimb identity

被引:227
作者
GibsonBrown, JJ
Agulnik, SI
Chapman, DL
Alexiou, M
Garvey, N
Silver, LM
Papaioannou, VE
机构
[1] COLUMBIA UNIV COLL PHYS & SURG,DEPT GENET & DEV,NEW YORK,NY 10032
[2] PRINCETON UNIV,LEWIS THOMAS LAB,DEPT MOLEC BIOL,PRINCETON,NJ 08544
关键词
T-box genes; limb; development; evolution; pattern formation; mouse;
D O I
10.1016/0925-4773(96)00514-X
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Tetrapod fore- and hindlimbs have evolved from the pectoral and pelvic fins of an ancient vertebrate ancestor. In this ancestor, the pectoral fin appears to have arisen following the rostral homeotic recapitulation of an existing pelvic appendage (Tabin and Laufer (1993), Nature 361, 692-693). Thus the basic appendage outgrowth program is reiterated in both tetrapod fore- and hindlimbs and the pectoral and pelvic fins of extant teleost fishes (Sordino et al. (1995) Nature 375, 678-681). Recently a novel family of putative transcription factors, which includes the T (Brachyury) locus, has been identified and dubbed the 'T-box' family. In mice, all of these genes have expression patterns indicative of involvement in embryonic induction (Chapman et al. (1996) Dev. Dyn., in press), and four (Tbx2-Tbx5) are represented as two cognate, linked gene pairs (Agulnik et al., (1996), Genetics, in press). We now report that, whereas Tbx2 and Tbx3 are expressed in similar spatiotemporal patterns in both limbs, Tbx5 and Tbx4 expression is primarily restricted to the developing fore- and hindlimb buds, respectively. These observations suggest that T-box genes have played a role in the evolution of fin and limb morphogenesis, and that Tbx5 and Tbx4 may have been divergently selected to play a role in the differential specification of fore- (pectoral) versus hind- (pelvic) limb (fin) identity.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 101
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   POSITION DEPENDENT EXPRESSION OF A HOMEOBOX GENE TRANSCRIPT IN RELATION TO AMPHIBIAN LIMB REGENERATION [J].
SAVARD, P ;
GATES, PB ;
BROCKES, JP .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1988, 7 (13) :4275-4282
[32]   MESODERM FORMATION IN RESPONSE TO BRACHYURY REQUIRES FGF SIGNALING [J].
SCHULTEMERKER, S ;
SMITH, JC .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) :62-67
[33]  
SIMON HG, 1993, DEVELOPMENT, V117, P1397
[34]   HOX GENE-EXPRESSION IN TELEOST FINS AND THE ORIGIN OF VERTEBRATE DIGITS [J].
SORDINO, P ;
VANDERHOEVEN, F ;
DUBOULE, D .
NATURE, 1995, 375 (6533) :678-681
[35]   HOX GENES AND SERIAL HOMOLOGY [J].
TABIN, C ;
LAUFER, E .
NATURE, 1993, 361 (6414) :692-693
[36]  
TABIN CJ, 1989, DEVELOPMENT, V105, P813
[37]   POSITIONAL SIGNALING AND SPECIFICATION OF DIGITS IN CHICK LIMB MORPHOGENESIS [J].
TICKLE, C ;
SUMMERBELL, D ;
WOLPERT, L .
NATURE, 1975, 254 (5497) :199-202
[38]  
WILKINSON DG, 1992, IN SITU HYBRIDIZATIO, P75
[39]   INTERACTION BETWEEN THE SIGNALING MOLECULES WNT7A AND SHH DURING VERTEBRATE LIMB DEVELOPMENT - DORSAL SIGNALS REGULATE ANTEROPOSTERIOR PATTERNING [J].
YANG, YZ ;
NISWANDER, L .
CELL, 1995, 80 (06) :939-947