Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve

被引:111
作者
Costa, Marco A.
Shoemaker, Steven
Futamatsu, Hideki
Klassen, Chris
Anglolillo, Dominick J.
Nguyen, Minh
Siuciak, Alan
Gilmore, Paul
Zenni, Martin M.
Guzman, Luis
Bass, Theodore A.
Wilke, Norbert
机构
[1] Univ Florida Shands Jacksonville, Ctr Cardiovasc, Res & Cardiovasc Imaging Core Labs, Div Cardiovasc, Jacksonville, FL 32209 USA
[2] Univ Florida Shands Jacksonville, Div Radiol, Jacksonville, FL 32209 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.053
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the ability of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with well-established anatomic and physiologic techniques. Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered by many investigators to be a reliable stenosis-specific method to determine hemodynamically significant CAD. Quantitative perfusion CMR is a promising noninvasive approach to detect CAD but has yet to be validated against FFR. Methods This is a prospective study in patients with suspected CAD who underwent coronary angiography, FFR, and CMR assessments. The quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was calculated in 720 myocardial sectors (8 sectors/slice). The MPR was calculated from the ratio between stress and rest myocardial flow based on signal intensity time curves using deconvolution analysis. Stress was simulated with adenosine for both FFR and MPR. The MPR assessments were compared to FFR (n = 44 coronary segments) and quantitative coronary angiography (n = 108 segments) in the corresponding coronary territories. Results The MPR was 1.54 +/- 0.36 in segments with FFR <= 0.75 (n = 14) and 2.11 +/- 0.68 in those with FFR >0.75 (n = 30; p = 0.0054). An MPR cutoff of 2.04 was 92.9% (95% Cl 77.9 to 100.0) sensitive and 56.7% (95% Cl 32.8 to 80.6) specific in predicting a coronary segment with FFR <= 0.75. The MPR was 1.54 +/- 0.49 in coronary segments with >= 50% diameter stenosis (DS) (n = 47) and 2.13 +/- 0.80 in segments with <50% DS (n = 61; p < 0.001). An MPR cutoff of 2.04 was 85.1% (95% Cl 71.1 to 99.2) sensitive and 49.2% (95% Cl 33.6 to 64.8) specific in predicting CAD with >= 50% DS. Conclusions Quantitative perfusion CMR is a safe noninvasive test that represents a stenosis-specific alternative to determine the hemodynamic significance of CAD.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 522
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance [J].
Al-Saadi, N ;
Nagel, E ;
Gross, M ;
Bornstedt, A ;
Schnackenburg, B ;
Klein, C ;
Klimek, W ;
Oswald, H ;
Fleck, E .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (12) :1379-1383
[2]   TISSUE MEAN TRANSIT-TIME FROM DYNAMIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY BY A SIMPLE DECONVOLUTION TECHNIQUE [J].
AXEL, L .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1983, 18 (01) :94-99
[3]   QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY IN PREDICTING FUNCTIONAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF STENOSES IN AN UNSELECTED PATIENT COHORT [J].
BARTUNEK, J ;
SYS, SU ;
HEYNDRICKX, GR ;
PIJLS, NHJ ;
DEBRUYNE, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 26 (02) :328-334
[4]  
BASSINGTHWAIGHT.B, 1984, HDB PHYSL CARDIOVASC, P549
[5]   Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis - A randomized trial [J].
Bech, GJW ;
De Bruyne, S ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
de Muinck, ED ;
Hoorntje, JC ;
Escaned, J ;
Stella, PR ;
Boersma, E ;
Bartunek, J ;
Koolen, JJ ;
Wijns, W .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (24) :2928-2934
[6]   Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty [J].
Bech, GJW ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
De Bruyne, B ;
Peels, KH ;
Michels, HR ;
Bonnier, HJRM ;
Koolen, JJ .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (07) :883-888
[7]   Magnetic resonance imaging versus Doppler guide wire in the assessment of coronary flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease [J].
Bedaux, WLF ;
Hofman, MBM ;
de Cock, CC ;
Stoel, MG ;
Visser, CA ;
van Rossum, AC .
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2002, 13 (07) :365-372
[8]   Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association [J].
Cerqueira, MD ;
Weissman, NJ ;
Dilsizian, V ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Kaul, S ;
Laskey, WK ;
Pennell, DJ ;
Rumberger, JA ;
Ryan, T ;
Verani, MS .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (04) :539-542
[9]   Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood mow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease [J].
Chamuleau, SAJ ;
Meuwissen, M ;
van Eck-Smit, BLF ;
Koch, KT ;
de Jong, A ;
de Winter, RJ ;
Schotborgh, CE ;
Bax, M ;
Verberne, HJ ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Piek, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (05) :1316-1322
[10]   Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans - Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve [J].
deBruyne, B ;
Bartunek, J ;
Sys, SU ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Heyndrickx, GR ;
Wijns, W .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) :1842-1849