Hippocampal lesions facilitate instrumental learning with delayed reinforcement but induce impulsive choice in rats

被引:101
作者
Cheung, THC
Cardinal, RN
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Expt Psychol, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
[2] Queens Med Ctr, Sch Med, Div Psychiat, Psychopharmacol Sect, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2202-6-36
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Animals must frequently act to influence the world even when the reinforcing outcomes of their actions are delayed. Learning with action-outcome delays is a complex problem, and little is known of the neural mechanisms that bridge such delays. When outcomes are delayed, they may be attributed to ( or associated with) the action that caused them, or mistakenly attributed to other stimuli, such as the environmental context. Consequently, animals that are poor at forming context-outcome associations might learn action-outcome associations better with delayed reinforcement than normal animals. The hippocampus contributes to the representation of environmental context, being required for aspects of contextual conditioning. We therefore hypothesized that animals with hippocampal lesions would be better than normal animals at learning to act on the basis of delayed reinforcement. We tested the ability of hippocampal-lesioned rats to learn a free-operant instrumental response using delayed reinforcement, and what is potentially a related ability - the ability to exhibit self-controlled choice, or to sacrifice an immediate, small reward in order to obtain a delayed but larger reward. Results: Rats with sham or excitotoxic hippocampal lesions acquired an instrumental response with different delays (0, 10, or 20 s) between the response and reinforcer delivery. These delays retarded learning in normal rats. Hippocampal-lesioned rats responded slightly less than sham-operated controls in the absence of delays, but they became better at learning ( relative to shams) as the delays increased; delays impaired learning less in hippocampal-lesioned rats than in shams. In contrast, lesioned rats exhibited impulsive choice, preferring an immediate, small reward to a delayed, larger reward, even though they preferred the large reward when it was not delayed. Conclusion: These results support the view that the hippocampus hinders action-outcome learning with delayed outcomes, perhaps because it promotes the formation of context-outcome associations instead. However, although lesioned rats were better at learning with delayed reinforcement, they were worse at choosing it, suggesting that self-controlled choice and learning with delayed reinforcement tax different psychological processes.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 117 条
[11]   Corticohippocampal contributions to spatial and contextual learning [J].
Burwell, RD ;
Saddoris, MP ;
Bucci, DJ ;
Wiig, KA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (15) :3826-3836
[12]   The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide, α-flupenthixol and behavioural manipulations on choice of signalled and unsignalled delayed reinforcement in rats [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Robbins, TW ;
Everitt, BJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 152 (04) :362-375
[13]   Limbic corticostriatal systems and delayed reinforcement [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Winstanley, CA ;
Robbins, TW ;
Everitt, BJ .
ADOLESCENT BRAIN DEVELOPMENT: VULNERABILITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2004, 1021 :33-50
[14]   Impulsive choice induced in rats by lesions of the nucleus accumbens core [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Pennicott, DR ;
Sugathapala, CL ;
Robbins, TW ;
Everitt, BJ .
SCIENCE, 2001, 292 (5526) :2499-2501
[15]   Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Parkinson, JA ;
Hall, J ;
Everitt, BJ .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2002, 26 (03) :321-352
[16]   Nucleus accumbens core lesions retard instrumental learning and performance with delayed reinforcement in the rat [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Cheung, TH .
BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 6 (1)
[17]   Choosing delayed rewards: Perspectives from learning theory, neurochemistry, and neuroanatomy [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Robbins, TW ;
Everitt, BJ .
CHOICE, BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS AND ADDICTION, 2003, :183-218
[18]  
CARDINAL RN, 2001, WHISKER VERSION 2
[19]  
Chen C, 1996, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V110, P1177
[20]   Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: Acquisition and retention [J].
Christian, KM ;
Thompson, RF .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2003, 10 (06) :427-455