Conventional and dedicated atrial overdrive pacing for the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the AFTherapy study

被引:40
作者
Camm, A. J. [1 ]
Sulke, N.
Edvardsson, N. [2 ]
Ritter, P. [3 ]
Albers, B. A. [4 ]
Ruiter, J. H.
Lewalter, T. [5 ]
Capucci, P. A. [6 ]
Hoffmann, E. [7 ]
机构
[1] St George Hosp, London, England
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Ctr Chirurg Val Or, St Cloud, France
[4] Vitatron BV, NL-6802 EE Arnhem, Netherlands
[5] Univ Bonn, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[6] Osped Civile, Piacenza, Italy
[7] German Heart Ctr, D-8000 Munich, Germany
来源
EUROPACE | 2007年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
atrial fibrillation; overdrive pacing; preventive pacing;
D O I
10.1093/europace/eum253
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims This investigation was conducted to determine the effectiveness of several conventional overdrive pacing modalities (single rate and rate responsive pacing at various lower rates) and of four dedicated preventive pacing algorithms in the suppression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Method and results In this multi-centre, randomized trial, 372 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF were enrolled. Patients received a dual-chamber pacing device capable of delivering conventional pacing therapy as well as dedicated AF prevention pacing therapies and to record detailed AF-related diagnostics. The primary endpoint was AF burden, whereas secondary endpoints were time to first AF episode and averaged sinus rhythm duration. During a conventional pacing phase, patients were randomized to single rate or rate-responsive pacing with lower rates of either 70 or 85 min(-1) or to a control group with single rate pacing at 40 min(-1). In the subsequent preventive pacing phase, patients underwent pacing at a tower rate of 70 min(-1) with or without concomitant application of four preventive pacing algorithms. A substantial amount of data was excluded from the analysis because of atrial sensing artefacts, identified in the device-captured diagnostics. In the conventional pacing phase, no significant differences were found between various lower rates and the control group receiving single rate pacing at 40 min(-1) or between single rate and rate-responsive pacing. Patients receiving preventive pacing with all four therapies enabled had a similar AF burden compared with patients treated with conventional pacing at 70 min(-1) (P = 0.47). Conclusions The results do not demonstrate a significant effect of conventional atrial. overdrive pacing or preventive pacing therapies. However, the observations provided important information for further consideration with respect to the design and conduct of future studies on the effect of atrial, pacing therapies for the reduction of AF.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1118
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Efficacy and tolerability of continuous overdrive atrial pacing in atrial fibrillation
    Lam, CTF
    Lau, CP
    Leung, SK
    Tse, HF
    Lee, KLF
    Tang, MO
    Tsang, V
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2000, 2 (04): : 286 - 291
  • [22] The effect of atrial pacing therapies on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden and frequency - Results of a randomized trial in patients with bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias
    Lee, MA
    Weachter, R
    Pollak, S
    Kremers, MS
    Naik, AM
    Silverman, R
    Tuzi, J
    Wang, W
    Johnson, LJ
    Euler, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (11) : 1926 - 1932
  • [23] Does atrial overdrive pacing prevent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in paced patients?
    Levy, T
    Walker, S
    Rex, S
    Paul, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 75 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [24] Individualized selection of pacing algorithms for the prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation:: Results from the VIP registry
    Lewalter, T
    Yang, A
    Pfeiffer, D
    Ruiter, J
    Schnitzler, G
    Markert, T
    Asklund, M
    Przibille, O
    Welz, A
    Esmailzadeh, B
    Linhart, M
    Lüderitz, B
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (02): : 124 - 134
  • [25] Rejection of atrial sensing artifacts by a pacing lead with short tip-to-ring spacing
    Nash, A
    Fröhlig, G
    Taborsky, M
    Stammwitz, E
    Maru, F
    Bouwens, LHM
    Çeliker, C
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2005, 7 (01): : 67 - 72
  • [26] A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome - Echocardiographic and clinical outcome
    Nielsen, JC
    Kristensen, L
    Andersen, HR
    Mortensen, PT
    Pedersen, OL
    Pedersen, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (04) : 614 - 623
  • [27] PIGNALBERI C, 2003, EUROPACE, V4, pB33
  • [28] PACEMAKER THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
    POLLAK, A
    FALK, RH
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1993, 125 (03) : 824 - 830
  • [29] Electrophysiologic predictors of the recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation within 30 days of cardioversion
    Raitt, MH
    Kusumoto, W
    Giraud, GD
    McAnulty, JH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (01) : 107 - 110
  • [30] LONG-TERM PACING IN SINUS NODE DISEASE - EFFECTS OF STIMULATION MODE ON CARDIOVASCULAR MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY
    ROSENQVIST, M
    BRANDT, J
    SCHULLER, H
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1988, 116 (01) : 16 - 22