Decomposition and attribution analysis of the transport sector's carbon dioxide intensity change in China

被引:84
作者
Huang, Fei [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Dequn [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qunwei [1 ,2 ]
Hang, Ye [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, 29 Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Transport sector; CO2; intensity; Index decomposition analysis; Production-theoretical decomposition analysis; Attribution analysis; REGIONAL CO2 EMISSIONS; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION; INDEX DECOMPOSITION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; DRIVING FORCES; TRENDS; GROWTH; PERFORMANCE; COUNTRIES; FREIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Understanding the factors driving changes in transport carbon dioxide (CO2) intensity and the contributions of different regions to each factor helps inform targeted emissions reduction policies. This paper provides a comprehensive approach, combining index decomposition analysis (IDA), production-theoretical decomposition analysis (PDA) and attribution analysis (AA), to decompose the changes in transport CO2 intensity into nine factors and identify the contributions of different regions to the individual factors. Energy-related and transport-related factors are considered simultaneously and some new factors are created to provide additional insights for exploring changes in transport CO2 intensity. An empirical study of the transport sector across 30 Chinese PARs (provincial administrative regions) resulted in three key findings. First, the effect of potential transport energy intensity and the effect of the economic output technology were the major drivers for the reduction in transport CO2 intensity, while the effect of potential transport intensity and the effect of energy utilization technology were the major factors that increased the transport CO2 intensity. Second, due to the diverse transport sector characteristics of the 30 PARs, their contributions to the four driving factors for the transport CO2 intensity mitigation varied. Third, specific policy implications in terms of energy conservation and transport management policy were proposed for the 30 PARs.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 358
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]   A comparison of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission trends among provinces in China [J].
Du, Kerui ;
Xie, Chunping ;
Ouyang, Xiaoling .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 73 :19-25
[12]   Understanding the rapid growth of China's energy consumption: A comprehensive decomposition framework [J].
Du, Kerui ;
Lin, Boqiang .
ENERGY, 2015, 90 :570-577
[13]  
Dulal H. B., 2009, POLICY RES WORKING P
[14]   Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from the transportation sector in Beijing [J].
Fan, Fengyan ;
Lei, Yalin .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 42 :135-145
[15]   Changes in carbon intensity in China: Empirical findings from 1980-2003 [J].
Fan, Ying ;
Liu, Lan-Cui ;
Wu, Gang ;
Tsai, Hsien-Tang ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (3-4) :683-691
[16]   Environmental performance:: an index number approach [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Hernandez-Sancho, F .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (04) :343-352
[17]   System dynamics modeling for urban energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A case study of Beijing, China [J].
Feng, Y. Y. ;
Chen, S. Q. ;
Zhang, L. X. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2013, 252 :44-52
[18]   Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for freight: trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1993 [J].
Greening, LA ;
Ting, M ;
Davis, WB .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (04) :331-361
[19]   Uncovering China's transport CO2 emission patterns at the regional level [J].
Guo, Bin ;
Geng, Yong ;
Franke, Bernd ;
Hao, Han ;
Liu, Yaxuan ;
Chiu, Anthony .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 74 :134-146
[20]   International comparison of industrial CO2 emission trends and the energy efficiency paradox utilizing production-based decomposition [J].
Kim, Kyunam ;
Kim, Yeonbae .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (05) :1724-1741