Colorectal polyps: Detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies

被引:46
作者
Iannaccone, R
Catalano, C
Mangiapane, F
Murakami, T
Lamazza, A
Fiori, E
Schillaci, A
Marin, D
Nofroni, I
Hori, M
Passariello, R
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Radiol Sci, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Surg Pietro Valdoni, Endoscop Unit, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Expt Med, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Pathol Med Biostat, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2373041747
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of low-radiation-close computed tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps by using two sequential colonoscopies, with the second colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was local ethics committee approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Colonographic images were acquired by using a low-dose multi-detector row CT protocol (effective milliampere-second setting, 10 mAs). Three observers interpreted the CT colonographic data separately and independently by using a two-dimensional technique. Initial conventional colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist unaware of the CT colonographic findings. Second colonoscopy performed within 2 weeks by a colonoscopist aware of both the CT colonographic and the initial colonoscopic findings served as the reference standard. The sensitivities of CT colonography and initial colonoscopy were calculated on a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. Specificities and positive and negative predictive values also were calculated on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent CT colonography and initial conventional colonoscopy on the same day. Per-polyp sensitivities were 62% and 83% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Sensitivities for detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger were 86% and 84% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Initial colonoscopy failed to depict 16 polyps, six of which were correctly detected with CT colonography. For identification of patients with polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively, had sensitivities of 84% and 90%, specificities of 82% and 100%, positive predictive values of 70% and 100%, and negative predictive values of 91% and 95%. CONCLUSION: Low-dose CT colonography compares favorably with colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, with markedly decreased performance for detection of polyps 5 mm in diameter or smaller. (c) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 937
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]   Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy [J].
Pickhardt, PJ ;
Nugent, PA ;
Mysliwiec, PA ;
Choi, JR ;
Schindler, WR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (05) :352-359
[32]   Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults [J].
Pickhardt, PJ ;
Choi, JR ;
Hwang, I ;
Butler, JA ;
Puckett, ML ;
Hildebrandt, HA ;
Wong, RK ;
Nugent, PA ;
Mysliwiec, PA ;
Schindler, WR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (23) :2191-2200
[33]   Validation of virtual colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps and masses - Rationale for proper study design [J].
Pineau, BC ;
Paskett, ED ;
Chen, GJ ;
Durkalski, VL ;
Espeland, MA ;
Vining, DJ .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2001, 30 (03) :133-140
[34]   Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps [J].
Pineau, BC ;
Paskett, ED ;
Chen, GJ ;
Espeland, MA ;
Phillips, K ;
Han, JP ;
Mikulaninec, C ;
Vining, DJ .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 125 (02) :304-310
[35]   Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK [J].
Rembacken, BJ ;
Fujii, T ;
Cairns, A ;
Dixon, MF ;
Yoshida, S ;
Chalmers, DM ;
Axon, ATR .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9211) :1211-1214
[36]   Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: Impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies [J].
Rex, DK ;
Chadalawada, V ;
Helper, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (09) :2000-2005
[37]   Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice [J].
Rex, DK ;
Rahmani, EY ;
Haseman, JH ;
Lemmel, GT ;
Kaster, S ;
Buckley, JS .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (01) :17-23
[38]   Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates [J].
Rex, DK .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (01) :33-36
[39]   An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy) [J].
Rex, DK ;
Vining, D ;
Kopecky, KK .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 50 (03) :309-313
[40]   Virtual colonoscopy: Time for some tough questions for radiologists and gastroenterologists [J].
Rex, DK .
ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (03) :260-263