Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration

被引:119
作者
Alsius, Agnes
Navarra, Jordi
Soto-Faraco, Salvador
机构
[1] Hosp Sant Joan Deu Edifici Docent, Parc Cient Barcelona, Barcelona 08950, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Dept Psicol Basica, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Crossmodal Res Lab, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[4] Inst Catalan Recerca I Estudis Avancats, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
attention; multisensory integration; speech perception; touch;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-007-1110-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
One of the classic examples of multisensory integration in humans occurs when speech sounds are combined with the sight of corresponding articulatory gestures. Despite the longstanding assumption that this kind of audiovisual binding operates in an attention-free mode, recent findings (Alsius et al. in Curr Biol, 15(9):839-843, 2005) suggest that audiovisual speech integration decreases when visual or auditory attentional resources are depleted. The present study addressed the generalization of this attention constraint by testing whether a similar decrease in multisensory integration is observed when attention demands are imposed on a sensory domain that is not involved in speech perception, such as touch. We measured the McGurk illusion in a dual task paradigm involving a difficult tactile task. The results showed that the percentage of visually influenced responses to audiovisual stimuli was reduced when attention was diverted to a tactile task. This finding is attributed to a modulatory effect on audiovisual integration of speech mediated by supramodal attention limitations. We suggest that the interactions between the attentional system and crossmodal binding mechanisms may be much more extensive and dynamic than it was advanced in previous studies.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 404
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]   SENSORY CONFLICT IN JUDGMENTS OF SPATIAL DIRECTION [J].
PICK, HL ;
WARREN, DH ;
HAY, JC .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1969, 6 (04) :203-+
[32]   Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task [J].
Rees, G ;
Frith, C ;
Lavie, N .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2001, 39 (09) :937-949
[33]   Assessing automaticity in audiovisual speech integration: evidence from the speeded classification task [J].
Soto-Faraco, S ;
Navarra, J ;
Alsius, A .
COGNITION, 2004, 92 (03) :B13-B23
[34]   Conscious access to the unisensory components of a cross-modal illusion [J].
Soto-Faraco, Salvador ;
Alsius, Agnes .
NEUROREPORT, 2007, 18 (04) :347-350
[35]  
Spence C., 2004, Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention
[36]   Selective attention and multisensory integration: Multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity [J].
Talsma, D ;
Woldorff, MG .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 17 (07) :1098-1114
[37]   Selective attention and audiovisual integration: Is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? [J].
Talsma, Durk ;
Doty, Tracy J. ;
Woldorff, Marty G. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2007, 17 (03) :679-690
[38]   Visual attention modulates audiovisual speech perception [J].
Tiippana, K ;
Andersen, TS ;
Sams, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 16 (03) :457-472
[39]   Audio-visual speech perception is special [J].
Tuomainen, J ;
Andersen, TS ;
Tiippana, K ;
Sams, M .
COGNITION, 2005, 96 (01) :B13-B22
[40]   Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex [J].
van Atteveldt, Nienke M. ;
Formisano, Ella ;
Goebel, Rainer ;
Blomert, Leo .
NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 36 (04) :1345-1360