Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer

被引:198
作者
Chang, Andrew C.
Ji, Hong
Birkmeyer, Nancy J.
Orringer, Mark B.
Birkmeyer, John D.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, M SCORE, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Although single-center series evaluating esophagectomy for cancer have demonstrated that this operation can be performed safely and with excellent outcomes, controversy remains regarding the comparable oncologic efficacy of the transhiatal and transthoracic approaches. This study was performed to determine outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for patients undergoing resection nationwide. Methods. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results -Medicare linked database (1992 to 2002), we identified registered patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. We evaluated operative mortality, late survival, and length of stay while adjusting for patient characteristics, tumor grade, and stage. As a surrogate for postoperative quality of life, we also assessed subsequent need for anastomotic dilation. Results. Of 868 patients undergoing either approach, for whom distinct Current Procedural Technology codes could be identified, 225 underwent transhiatal and 643 received transthoracic esophagectomy. Lower operative mortality rate was observed after a transhiatal than transthoracic approach (6.7% versus 13.1%, p = 0.009). Observed 5-year survival was higher for patients undergoing transhiatal rather than transthoracic esophagectomy (30.5% versus 22.7%, p = 0.02). After adjusting for differences in tumor stage, patient, and provider factors, this survival advantage was no longer statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio for mortality, 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 1.20). Patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy were more likely to require endoscopic dilatation within 6 months of surgery (43.1% versus 34.5% for transthoracic operations, p = 0.02). Conclusions. In the largest population-based study to date assessing long-term outcome after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, transhiatal esophagectomy confers an early survival advantage, but long-term survival does not appear to differ according to surgical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 429
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [J].
Hulscher, JBF ;
van Sandick, JW ;
de Boer, AGEM ;
Wijnhoven, BPL ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Fockens, P ;
Stalmeier, PFM ;
ten Kate, FJW ;
van Dekken, H ;
Obertop, H ;
Tilanus, HW ;
van Lanschot, JJB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (21) :1662-1669
[12]   The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection [J].
Hulscher, JBF ;
van Sandick, JW ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Obertop, H ;
van Lanschot, JJB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 191 (02) :143-148
[13]   Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced esophageal cancer: Evidence-based review of surgery alone and combined-modality therapy [J].
Iyer, R ;
Wilkinson, N ;
Demmy, T ;
Javle, M .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (07) :665-673
[14]   En bloc vs transhiatal esophagectorny for stage T3 N1 adenocarcinorna of the distal esophagus [J].
Johansson, J ;
DeMeester, TR ;
Hagen, JA ;
DeMeester, SR ;
Peters, JH ;
Öberg, S ;
Bremner, CG .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 139 (06) :627-631
[15]   Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. [J].
Macdonald, JS ;
Smalley, SR ;
Benedetti, J ;
Hundahl, SA ;
Estes, NC ;
Stemmermann, GN ;
Haller, DG ;
Ajani, JA ;
Gunderson, LL ;
Jessup, JM ;
Martenson, JA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (10) :725-730
[16]   Esophageal resection for cancer of the esophagus: Long-term function and quality of life [J].
McLarty, AJ ;
Deschamps, C ;
Trastek, VF ;
Allen, MS ;
Pairolero, PC ;
Harmsen, WS .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 63 (06) :1568-1572
[17]   A surgeon's case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer strongly influences the operative mortality rate [J].
Migliore, Marcello ;
Choong, Cliff K. ;
Lim, Eric ;
Goldsmith, Kimberley A. ;
Ritchie, Andy ;
Wells, Francis C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 32 (02) :375-379
[18]   Node status in transmural esophageal adenocarcinoma and outcome after en bloc esophagectomy [J].
Nigro, JJ ;
DeMeester, SR ;
Hagen, JA ;
DeMeester, TR ;
Peters, JH ;
Kiyabu, M ;
Campos, GMR ;
Öberg, S ;
Gastal, O ;
Crookes, PF ;
Bremner, CG .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 117 (05) :960-966
[19]   The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence [J].
Pohl, H ;
Welch, HG .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (02) :142-146
[20]   Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: A prospective study of 945 patients [J].
Rentz, J ;
Bull, D ;
Harpole, D ;
Bailey, S ;
Neumayer, L ;
Pappas, T ;
Krasnicka, B ;
Henderson, W ;
Daley, J ;
Khuri, S .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 125 (05) :1114-1120