A comparison of field-based similarity searching methods: CatShape, FBSS, and ROCS

被引:46
作者
Moffat, Kirstin [1 ]
Gillet, Valerie J. [1 ]
Whittle, Martin [1 ]
Bravi, Gianpaolo [2 ]
Leach, Andrew R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Informat Studies, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Stevenage SG1 2NY, Herts, England
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci700130j
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Three field-based similarity methods are compared in retrospective virtual screening experiments. The methods are the CatShape module of CATALYST, ROCS, and an in-house program developed at the University of Sheffield called FBSS. The programs are used in both rigid and flexible searches carried out in the MDL. Drug Data Report. UNITY 2D fingerprints are also used to provide a comparison with a more traditional approach to similarity searching, and similarity based on simple whole-molecule properties is used to provide a baseline for the more sophisticated searches. Overall, UNITY 2D fingerprints and ROCS with the chemical force field option gave comparable performance and were superior to the shape-only 3D methods. When the flexible methods were compared with the rigid methods, it was generally found that the flexible methods gave slightly better results than their respective rigid methods; however, the increased performance did not justify the additional computational cost required.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 729
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Efficient generation, storage, and manipulation of fully flexible pharmacophore multiplets and their use in 3-D similarity searching [J].
Abrahamian, E ;
Fox, PC ;
Nærum, L ;
Christensen, IT ;
Thogersen, H ;
Clark, RD .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, 43 (02) :458-468
[2]   Scaffold hopping using clique detection applied to reduced graphs [J].
Barker, EJ ;
Buttar, D ;
Cosgrove, DA ;
Gardiner, EJ ;
Kitts, P ;
Willett, P ;
Gillet, VJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2006, 46 (02) :503-511
[3]   The properties of known drugs .1. Molecular frameworks [J].
Bemis, GW ;
Murcko, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 39 (15) :2887-2893
[4]   Discussion of measures of enrichment in virtual screening: Comparing the information content of descriptors with increasing levels of sophistication [J].
Bender, A ;
Glen, RC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2005, 45 (05) :1369-1375
[5]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[6]   Scaffold searching: Automated identification of similar ring systems for the design of combinatorial libraries [J].
Bohl, M ;
Dunbar, J ;
Gifford, EM ;
Heritage, T ;
Wild, DJ ;
Willett, P ;
Wilton, DJ .
QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS, 2002, 21 (06) :590-597
[7]  
Bohm Hans-Joachim, 2004, Drug Discov Today Technol, V1, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.10.009
[8]   In vitro and in silico affinity fingerprints:: Finding similarities beyond structural classes [J].
Briem, H ;
Lessel, UF .
PERSPECTIVES IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND DESIGN, 2000, 20 (01) :231-244
[9]   The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding [J].
Brown, RD ;
Martin, YC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1997, 37 (01) :1-9
[10]   Use of structure Activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection [J].
Brown, RD ;
Martin, YC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1996, 36 (03) :572-584