How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors?

被引:38
作者
Wentholt, I. M. E. [1 ]
Hart, A. A. M. [2 ]
Hoekstra, J. B. L. [1 ]
Devries, J. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1089/dia.2007.0216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Continuous glucose monitors may be valuable tools for improving glycemic control and avoiding hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes. To this goal, sensor readings must adequately reflect the actual blood glucose, emphasizing the need for solid accuracy assessment methods for continuous glucose sensor readings. Analysis of continuous glucose data is challenging, and despite many efforts there still is no all-embracing method to overcome the obstacles in the assessment of continuous data. In this review we disclose the weaknesses of currently available methods and propose a guideline for sensor accuracy assessment and comparison. For accuracy assessment it is best to first plot the sensor readings against the reference values and draw a line of identity, visualizing the degree of agreement. Thereafter data pairs should be given in a Bland-Altman plot to detect a possible relationship between the difference and the mean. The next step is to calculate the absolute relative difference over all paired readings together and per glucose range. A possible lag time between the measurements of both methods can be detected by combined curve fitting. Finally, sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting hypoglycemia are important indicators of the sensors' performance. For comparing the accuracy between different glucose sensors it is best to use indirect comparison against blood glucose, rather than direct comparison methods, since none of the current glucose sensors is accurate enough to be considered the reference value.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 68
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[2]   MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[3]   Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Nevill, AM .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) :217-238
[4]  
Batterham AM, 2004, SPORTSCIENCE, V8, P47
[5]   Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 22 (01) :85-93
[6]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[7]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[8]   Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: a pilot study [J].
Bode, BW ;
Gross, TM ;
Thornton, KR ;
Mastrototaro, JJ .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1999, 46 (03) :183-190
[9]   Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose - Lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes [J].
Boland, E ;
Monsod, T ;
Delucia, M ;
Brandt, CA ;
Fernando, S ;
Tamborlane, WV .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (11) :1858-1862
[10]   A comparison between optimal and actuarial health care costs of adolescents with diabetes [J].
Cameron, FJ ;
Widdison, J ;
Boyce, D ;
Gebert, R .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2004, 40 (1-2) :56-59