Quantification of line-edge roughness of photoresists. II. Scaling and fractal analysis and the best roughness descriptors

被引:114
作者
Constantoudis, V [1 ]
Patsis, GP [1 ]
Tserepi, A [1 ]
Gogolides, E [1 ]
机构
[1] NCSR Demokritos, Inst Microelect, IMEL, GR-15310 Athens, Greece
来源
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B | 2003年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1116/1.1570844
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A search for the best and most complete description of line-edge roughness (LER) is presented. The root mean square (rms) value of the edge (sigma value) does not provide a complete characterization of LER since it cannot give information about its spatial complexity. In order to get this missing information, we analyze the detected line edges as found from scanning electron microscope (SEM) image analysis [see Paper I: G. P Patsis et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 21, 1008 (2003)] using scaling and fractal concepts. It is shown that the majority of analyzed experimental edges exhibit a self-affine character and thus the suggested parameters for the description of their roughness should be: (1) the sigma value, (2) the correlation length xi, and (3) the roughness exponent alpha. The dependencies of alpha and xi on various image recording and analysis parameters (magnification, resolution, threshold value, etc.) are thoroughly examined as well as their implications on the calculation of sigma when it is carried out by averaging over the sigmas of a number of segments of the edge. In particular, xi is shown to be connected to the minimum segment size for which the average sigma becomes independent of the segment size, whereas alpha seems to be related to the relative contribution of high frequency fluctuations to LER. (C) 2003 American Vacuum Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1026
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Barabasi A-Ls, 1995, FRACTAL CONCEPTS SUR, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511599798, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511599798]
[2]   Fractal analysis of sampled profiles:: Systematic study -: art. no. 021601 [J].
Castelnovo, C ;
Podestà, A ;
Piseri, P ;
Milani, P .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2002, 65 (02)
[3]   Characterization and simulation of surface and line-edge roughness in photoresists [J].
Constandoudis, V ;
Gogolides, E ;
Patsis, GP ;
Tserepi, A ;
Valamontes, ES .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2001, 19 (06) :2694-2698
[4]   Roughness characterization in positive and negative resists [J].
Constantoudis, V ;
Gogolides, E ;
Tserepi, A ;
Diakoumakos, CD ;
Valamontes, ES .
MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2002, 61-2 :793-801
[5]  
Deng J, 1999, J PHYS D APPL PHYS, V32, pL45, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/32/12/101
[6]   EVALUATING THE FRACTAL DIMENSION OF PROFILES [J].
DUBUC, B ;
QUINIOU, JF ;
ROQUESCARMES, C ;
TRICOT, C ;
ZUCKER, SW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1989, 39 (03) :1500-1512
[7]   QUANTITATIVE MICROROUGHNESS ANALYSIS DOWN TO THE NANOMETER-SCALE [J].
DUMAS, P ;
BOUFFAKHREDDINE, B ;
AMRA, C ;
VATEL, O ;
ANDRE, E ;
GALINDO, R ;
SALVAN, F .
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 1993, 22 (09) :717-722
[8]  
Kaya S, 2001, SIMULATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSES AND DEVICES 2001, P78
[9]   FRACTAL CHARACTER OF FRACTURE SURFACES OF METALS [J].
MANDELBROT, BB ;
PASSOJA, DE ;
PAULLAY, AJ .
NATURE, 1984, 308 (5961) :721-722
[10]  
MANDELBROT BB, 1982, FRACTAL GEOMETRY NA