Force and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs

被引:101
作者
Luechinger, R
Duru, F
Scheidegger, MB
Boesiger, P
Candinas, R
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Cardiac Arrhythmia Unit, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Engn & Med Informat, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2001年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; magnetic force; magnetic torque; safety;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00199.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely accepted tool for the diagnosis of a variety of disease states. However, the presence of an implanted pacemaker is considered to be a strict contraindication to MRI in a vast majority of centers due to safety concerns. In phantom studies, the authors investigated the force and torque effects of the static magnetic field of MRI on pacemakers and ICDs. Thirty-one pacemakers (15 dual chamber and 16 single chamber units) from eight manufacturers and 13 ICDs from four manufacturers were exposed to the static magnetic field of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. Magnetic force and acceleration measurements rr ere obtained quantitatively, and torque measurements were made qualitatively. For pacemakers, the measured magnetic force was in the range of 0.05-3.60 N. Pacemakers released after 1995 had low magnetic force values as compared to the older devices. For these devices, the measured acceleration was even lower than the gravity of the earth (< 9.81 N/kg). Likewise, the torque levels were significantly reduced in newer generation pacemakers (<less than or equal to> 2 from a scale of 6). ICD devices, except for one recent model, showed higher force (1.03-5.85 N), acceleration 9.5-34.2 N/kg), and torque (5-6 out of 6) levels. III conclusion, modern pacemakers present no safety risk with respect to magnetic force and torque induced by the static magnetic field of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. However, ICD devices, despite considerable reduction in size and weight, may still pose problems due to strong magnetic force and torque.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 205
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Effects of magnetic resonance Imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Moshage, W ;
Diem, B ;
Bieberle, T ;
Schibgilla, V ;
Bachmann, K .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 134 (03) :467-473
[2]   NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN A PATIENT WITH A DDD PACEMAKER [J].
ALAGONA, P ;
TOOLE, JC ;
MANISCALCO, BS ;
GLOVER, MU ;
ABERNATHY, GT ;
PRIDA, XE .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 12 (04) :619-619
[3]  
AVERY JE, 1988, J TENNESSEE MED ASS, V61, P523
[4]   Pacing in magnetic resonance imaging environment:: Clinical and technical considerations on compatibility [J].
Duru, F ;
Luechinger, R ;
Scheidegger, MB ;
Lüscher, TF ;
Boesiger, P ;
Candinas, R .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (02) :113-124
[5]   Rapid ventricular pacing in a pacemaker patient undergoing magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Fontaine, JM ;
Mohamed, FB ;
Gottlieb, C ;
Callans, DJ ;
Marchlinski, FE .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (06) :1336-1339
[6]  
Garcia-Bolao I, 1998, ACTA CARDIOL, V53, P33
[7]   Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Johnson, D ;
Levine, PA ;
Wilkoff, BL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (06) :913-919
[8]   NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN A PATIENT WITH A PACEMAKER [J].
INBAR, S ;
LARSON, J ;
BURT, T ;
MAFEE, M ;
EZRI, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 305 (03) :174-175
[9]  
MOSELY I, 1994, BRIT MED J, V208, P1181
[10]   POTENTIAL HAZARDS AND ARTIFACTS OF FERROMAGNETIC AND NONFERROMAGNETIC SURGICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING [J].
NEW, PFJ ;
ROSEN, BR ;
BRADY, TJ ;
BUONANNO, FS ;
KISTLER, JP ;
BURT, CT ;
HINSHAW, WS ;
NEWHOUSE, JH ;
POHOST, GM ;
TAVERAS, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 147 (01) :139-148