Feasibility of automatic marker detection with an a-Si flat-panel imager

被引:45
作者
Nederveen, AJ [1 ]
Lagendijk, JJW [1 ]
Hofman, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/321
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Here we study automatic detection of implanted gold markers relative to the field boundary in portal images for on-line position verification. Portal images containing 1-2 MU were taken with an amorphous silicon flat-panel imager. The images were obtained with lateral field at 18 MV. Both the detection success rate and the localization accuracy of markers of 1.0 and 1.2 mm diameter were determined with the help of a marker detection method based on a marker extraction kernel. A method for determining a fiducial reference point related to the field boundary was developed. Detection success rates were 0.99, 0.90 and 0.95 for markers of 1.2 mm diameter and 5 mm length, 1.0 mm diameter and 5 mm length and 1.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length respectively. The localization accuracy appeared to be better than 0.3 mm. The reference point could be reproduced with an accuracy equal to 1 pixel (0.5 mm at isocentre) within one fraction. During the first few seconds of a treatment fraction the field edge was not stable, which appeared to be an effect of the motion of the radiation source. Thanks to the use an a-Si flat-panel imager, on-line position verification using implanted gold markers becomes clinically feasible. We can use a clinically acceptable marker diameter as small as 1.0 mm: These markers can be automatically detected in portal images obtained with 1-2 MU relative to a stable reference point related to the field boundary.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1230
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Megavoltage imaging with a large-area, flat-panel, amorphous silicon imager [J].
Antonuk, LE ;
Yorkston, J ;
Huang, WD ;
Sandler, H ;
Siewerdsen, JH ;
ElMohri, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (03) :661-672
[2]   Initial performance evaluation of an indirect-detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) prototype for megavoltage imaging [J].
Antonuk, LE ;
El-Mohri, Y ;
Huang, WD ;
Jee, KW ;
Siewerdsen, JH ;
Maolinbay, M ;
Scarpine, VE ;
Sandler, H ;
Yorkston, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :437-454
[3]   Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: Technical feasibility [J].
Balter, JM ;
Lam, KL ;
Sandler, HM ;
Littles, JF ;
Bree, RL ;
TenHaken, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05) :1281-1286
[4]   MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE MOVEMENT OVER THE COURSE OF ROUTINE RADIOTHERAPY USING IMPLANTED MARKERS [J].
BALTER, JM ;
SANDLER, HM ;
LAM, K ;
BREE, RL ;
LICHTER, AS ;
TENHAKEN, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01) :113-118
[5]  
Bergamaschi L, 1998, COMP MET WATER RES, V12, P305
[6]   RADIATION-FIELD EDGE-DETECTION IN PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BIJHOLD, J ;
GILHUIJS, KGA ;
VANHERK, M ;
MEERTENS, H .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 36 (12) :1705-1710
[7]   A REVIEW OF ELECTRONIC PORTAL IMAGING DEVICES (EPIDS) [J].
BOYER, AL ;
ANTONUK, L ;
FENSTER, A ;
VANHERK, M ;
MEERTENS, H ;
MUNRO, P ;
REINSTEIN, LE ;
WONG, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (01) :1-16
[8]   PROSTATE MOTION DURING STANDARD RADIOTHERAPY AS ASSESSED BY FIDUCIAL MARKERS [J].
CROOK, JM ;
RAYMOND, Y ;
SALHANI, D ;
YANG, H ;
ESCHE, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) :35-42
[9]   A prototype amorphous silicon array based radiotherapy portal imager [J].
Drake, DG ;
Jaffray, DA ;
Wong, JW .
PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING - MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3032 :32-41
[10]   METHODS FOR FULLY AUTOMATED VERIFICATION OF PATIENT SET-UP IN EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY WITH POLYGON SHAPED FIELDS [J].
EILERTSEN, K ;
SKRETTING, A ;
TENNVASSAS, TL .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (06) :993-1012