Radiation exposure in spiral computed tomography -: Dose distribution and dose reduction

被引:26
作者
Hidajat, N [1 ]
Mäurer, J [1 ]
Schröder, RJ [1 ]
Wolf, M [1 ]
Vogl, T [1 ]
Felix, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Virchow Clin, Dept Radiol Strahlenklin & Poliklin, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
spiral CT; radiation exposure; dose reduction; dose distribution; film dosimetry;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199901000-00008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors investigate the dose distribution of spiral and conventional computed tomography (CT) with film densitometry and to present a new method of evaluating the possibility of dose savings with spiral CT. METHODS. Films were exposed in a cuboid polymethylmethacrylate phantom in conventional and spiral scan technique. Axial density profiles were obtained by digitizing the films using a fluorescent light scanner. The ratio of the number of rotations in spiral CT to the number of slices in conventional CT was calculated, RESULTS In spiral CT with a pitch of 2, the densities in all points were lower than those in corresponding points in spiral CT with a pitch of 1 and in conventional CT with slice distance equal to slice thickness. A pitch of 1.5 in spiral CT led to a dose reduction of 14% to 30% compared with conventional CT. CONCLUSIONS. Increasing the pitch in spiral CT leads to a reduction of both integral dose and absorbed doses within the examined body region. The reduction of the integral dose can be significant, especially in cases where slice overlapping is diagnostically advantageous.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   SPIRAL CT - DECREASED SPATIAL-RESOLUTION INVIVO DUE TO BROADENING OF SECTION-SENSITIVITY PROFILE [J].
BRINK, JA ;
HEIKEN, JP ;
BALFE, DM ;
SAGEL, SS ;
DICROCE, J ;
VANNIER, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (02) :469-474
[2]   PULMONARY NODULE - EVALUATION WITH SPIRAL VOLUMETRIC CT [J].
COSTELLO, P ;
ANDERSON, W ;
BLUME, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (03) :875-876
[3]   SPIRAL CT OF THE PANCREAS WITH MULTIPLANAR DISPLAY [J].
FISHMAN, EK ;
WYATT, SH ;
NEY, DR ;
KUHLMAN, JE ;
SIEGELMAN, SS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 159 (06) :1209-1215
[4]   The quality of 3D reconstructions from 1.0 and 1.5 pitch helical and conventional CT [J].
Hopper, KD ;
Pierantozzi, D ;
Potok, PS ;
Kasales, CJ ;
TenHave, TR ;
Meilstrup, JW ;
VanSlyke, MA ;
Mahraj, R ;
Westacott, S ;
Hartzel, JS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (05) :841-847
[5]   SPIRAL VOLUMETRIC CT WITH SINGLE-BREATH-HOLD TECHNIQUE, CONTINUOUS TRANSPORT, AND CONTINUOUS SCANNER ROTATION [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
SEISSLER, W ;
KLOTZ, E ;
VOCK, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :181-183
[6]   A COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND SPIRAL CT - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY ON THE DETECTION OF SPHERICAL LESIONS [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
POLACIN, A ;
SUSS, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1994, 18 (02) :167-176
[7]   PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF SPIRAL CT SCANNING [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
POLACIN, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (05) :910-915
[8]   RADIATION EXPOSURE DURING CT USING STANDARD AND SPIRAL TECHNIQUES [J].
LANGKOWSKI, JH ;
POGODA, P ;
HESS, A .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1994, 161 (01) :3-11
[9]  
MCGHEE PL, 1994, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V45, P124
[10]   EVALUATION OF SECTION SENSITIVITY PROFILES AND IMAGE NOISE IN SPIRAL CT [J].
POLACIN, A ;
KALENDER, WA ;
MARCHAL, G .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) :29-35