Social and genetic influences on adolescent religious attitudes and practices

被引:52
作者
Eaves, Lindon J. [1 ]
Hatemi, Peter K. [1 ]
Prom-Wornley, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
Murrelle, Lenn [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Human Genet, Virginia Inst Psychiat & Behav Genet, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/sof.0.0050
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The authors explore the contributions of social and genetic influences to religious attitudes and practices in a population-based sample of 11-18 year olds and their mothers who responded to a Religious Attitudes and Practices Inventory and Religious Rearing Practices Inventory respectively. Contrary to genetic studies examining adult religious behavior, genetic influences were small, accounting for only 10 percent of the variance. Rather, the effects of the social environment were much larger, greater than 50 percent, and a majority of offspring similarity was explained by familial rearing. In light of the divergent finding between adolescents and adults, one supporting a socialization model and the other a genetic model, the importance of integrating genetic and social science methodology for complex social behaviors is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1646
页数:26
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]  
Fisher R. A., 1999, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition
[22]  
FULKER DW, 1979, STRUCTURE MEASUREMEN, P154
[23]   The genetics of voting: An Australian twin study [J].
Hatemi, Peter K. ;
Medland, Sarah E. ;
Morley, Katherine I. ;
Heath, Andrew C. ;
Martin, Nicholas G. .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2007, 37 (03) :435-448
[24]  
HATEMI PK, 2007, AM POL SCI ASS C SEP
[25]   THE RESOLUTION OF CULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL INHERITANCE - INFORMATIVENESS OF DIFFERENT RELATIONSHIPS [J].
HEATH, AC ;
KENDLER, KS ;
EAVES, LJ ;
MARKELL, D .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1985, 15 (05) :439-465
[26]   PROMAX - A QUICK METHOD FOR ROTATION TO OBLIQUE SIMPLE STRUCTURE [J].
HENDRICKSON, AE ;
WHITE, PO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1964, 17 (01) :65-70
[27]   The relative effect of nature and nurture influences on twin differences [J].
Holzinger, KJ .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1929, 20 :241-248
[28]  
Jencks C. A., 1973, INEQUALITY REASSESSM
[29]   COMPARISON OF BIOMETRICAL GENETICAL, MAVA, AND CLASSICAL APPROACHES TO ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR [J].
JINKS, JL ;
FULKER, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 73 (05) :311-349
[30]   The genotype conception of heredity [J].
Johannsen, W .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1911, 45 :129-159