Impact of family structure and stability on academic outcome in preterm children at 10 years of age

被引:104
作者
Gross, SJ
Mettelman, BB
Dye, TD
Slagle, TA
机构
[1] SUNY Syracuse, Upstate Med Univ, Dept Pediat, Syracuse, NY USA
[2] SUNY Syracuse, Upstate Med Univ, Dept Psychiat, Syracuse, NY USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Dept Community & Prevent Med, Rochester, NY USA
[4] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mpd.2001.111945
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare school performance at age 10 years in a cohort of extremely preterm children and term control subjects and to examine the impact of family composition and stability on performance. Study design: Prospective, longitudinal 'follow-up from birth to 10 years of age of a regional cohort of children born at 24 to 31 weeks of gestational age and sociodemographically matched term control subjects. Family composition, extent of parental care giving, and family moves were tracked sequentially. At 10 years, academic achievement and school performance were ascertained for 118 of 125 (94%) preterm survivors and 119 of 125 (95%) term children. Results: Term children were more likely to demonstrate optimal school outcome (appropriate grade level without additional classroom assistance) than were preterm children (odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.9-6.0). Medical complications related to prematurity had little impact on school outcome. Among preterm children, optimal school outcome was significantly associated with increased parental education, child rearing by 2 parents (regardless of marital status), and stability in family composition and geographic residence over 10 years. These environmental influences were less pronounced among term control subjects. Conclusion: Although preterm children performed less well in school than term children, family factors were stronger predictors of school performance than were perinatal complications.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 175
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 1991, Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile
[2]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, INTEGRATIVE GUIDE 19
[3]  
ADAMS PF, 1989, VITAL HLTH STAT 10, V173, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], WECHSLER INTELLIGENC
[5]  
AYLWARD GP, 1992, J DEV BEHAV PEDIATR, V13, P222
[6]   HOME-ENVIRONMENT AND SCHOOL PERFORMANCE - A 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP AND EXAMINATION OF 3 MODELS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION [J].
BRADLEY, RH ;
CALDWELL, BM ;
ROCK, SL .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1988, 59 (04) :852-867
[7]  
BYRD RS, 1994, PEDIATRICS, V93, P481
[8]   DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME OF PRETERM INFANTS WITH TRANSIENT NEUROMOTOR ABNORMALITIES [J].
DEUGENIO, DB ;
SLAGLE, TA ;
METTELMAN, BB ;
GROSS, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1993, 147 (05) :570-574
[9]   CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF GESTATIONAL AGE IN NEWBORN INFANT [J].
DUBOWITZ, LM ;
DUBOWITZ, V ;
GOLDBERG, C .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1970, 77 (01) :1-+
[10]  
ESCALONA SK, 1982, PEDIATRICS, V70, P670