Recalling shared vs. unshared information mentioned during group discussion: Toward understanding differential repetition rates

被引:13
作者
Larson, James R., Jr. [1 ]
Harmon, Victoria M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
group discussion; information sampling model; memory; shared information; unshared information;
D O I
10.1177/1368430207078692
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
University students participated in structured four-person group discussions in which they described to the group, and heard other group members describe, information pertaining to a to-be-made decision. Beforehand, participants had read all of the information that they themselves described, but only half of the information that they heard others describe. It was predicted and found that, following discussion, participants (a) better remembered the information that they heard others describe if they had already read that information prior to discussion, and (b) remembered best of all the information that they themselves described during discussion. These results suggest that the often-found tendency of groups to repeat more of the shared than unshared information that gets mentioned during unconstrained group discussions may be due in part to differences that exist in group members' ability to recall already-mentioned shared vs. unshared information.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 322
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   INFORMATION SAMPLING IN STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DISCUSSIONS OF 3-PERSON AND 6-PERSON GROUPS [J].
STASSER, G ;
TAYLOR, LA ;
HANNA, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (01) :67-78
[22]  
Stasser G, 1992, GROUP PROCESS PRODUC, P48
[23]   Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making [J].
Winquist, JR ;
Larson, JR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (02) :371-377
[24]   From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm [J].
Wittenbaum, GM ;
Hollingshead, AB ;
Botero, IC .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2004, 71 (03) :286-310
[25]   The bias toward discussing shared information -: Why are high-status group members immune? [J].
Wittenbaum, GM .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (03) :379-400
[26]   A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement [J].
Wittenbaum, GM ;
Bowman, JM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 40 (02) :169-184
[27]   Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information [J].
Wittenbaum, GM ;
Hubbell, AP ;
Zuckerman, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 77 (05) :967-978
[28]   Information sampling in decision-making groups - The impact of members' task-relevant status [J].
Wittenbaum, GM .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1998, 29 (01) :57-84
[29]  
WITTENBAUM GM, 2001, CURRENT DIRECTIONS P, V10, P72
[30]   GENERATIVE PROCESSES OF COMPREHENSION [J].
WITTROCK, MC .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 24 (04) :345-376