Clinical Utility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Can ADC Values Contribute to Assess the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer?

被引:105
作者
Itou, Yasushi [1 ,2 ]
Nakanishi, Katsuyuki [2 ]
Narumi, Yoshifumi
Nishizawa, Yasuko [3 ]
Tsukuma, Hideaki [4 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Coll, Higashinari Ku, Dept Radiol, Osaka 5378511, Japan
[2] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Osaka, Japan
[3] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Pathol, Res Inst, Osaka, Japan
[4] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Canc Control & Stat, Osaka, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; diffusion-weighted MR Images; apparent diffusion coefficient; Gleason score; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; GLEASON SCORE; GRADE; DISEASE; ADENOCARCINOMA; PREDICTION; SPECIMENS; PROGNOSIS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.22317
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and Gleason score (GS) in prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 60 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were selected for this study. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained using a 1.5 T system. ADC values were analyzed between three groups: GS of 6 or less (n = 7); GS of 7 (n = 37); and GS of 8 or higher (n = 16). ADC values of the three GS groups were statistically analyzed in order to determine the relationship with GS. In the 37 patients with GS = 7 the difference in ADC values between GS 3+4 and GS 4+3 was analyzed. Results: Median ADC values (10(-3) mm(2)/s) of the three GS groups were 1.04 (GS = 6 or less), 0.867 (GS = 7), and 0.729 (GS = 8 or higher). Although there was considerable overlap among the groups, the differences in ADC were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). There was a significant inverse correlation between GS and ADC values (z = -0.437, P < 0.0005). Median ADC values (10(-3) mm(2)/s) of GS 3+4 and GS 4+3 patients were 0.88 and 0.814, respectively (P< 0.05). Conclusion: ADC values showed a negative correlation with GS. Pathologically, however, there was considerable intrasubject heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 172
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   HETEROGENEITY OF PROSTATE-CANCER IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS [J].
AIHARA, M ;
WHEELER, TM ;
OHORI, M ;
SCARDINO, PT .
UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (01) :60-66
[2]   Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: Accuracy and clinical implications [J].
Cookson, MS ;
Fleshner, NE ;
Soloway, SM ;
Fair, WR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) :559-562
[3]   A WILCOXON-TYPE TEST FOR TREND [J].
CUZICK, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1985, 4 (01) :87-90
[4]   Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer [J].
deSouza, N. M. ;
Riches, S. F. ;
VanAs, N. J. ;
Morgan, V. A. ;
Ashley, S. A. ;
Fisher, C. ;
Payne, G. S. ;
Parker, C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (07) :774-782
[5]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[6]   Primary gleason pattern as a predictor of disease progression in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer - A multivariate analysis of 823 men treated with radical prostatectomy [J].
Herman, CM ;
Kattan, MW ;
Ohori, M ;
Scardino, PT ;
Wheeler, TM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 25 (05) :657-660
[7]   Malignant astrocytic tumors: Clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis [J].
Higano, Shuichi ;
Yun, Xia ;
Kumabe, Toshihiro ;
Watanabe, Mika ;
Mugikura, Shunji ;
Umetsu, Atsushi ;
Sato, Akihiro ;
Yamada, Takayuki ;
Takahashi, Shoki .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (03) :839-846
[8]   MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in the pre-treatment evaluation of prostate cancer (Publication with Expression of Concern) [J].
Hricak, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 :S103-S111
[9]   Cancer statistics, 2004 [J].
Jemal, A ;
Tiwari, RC ;
Murray, T ;
Ghafoor, A ;
Samuels, A ;
Ward, E ;
Feuer, EJ ;
Thun, MJ .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2004, 54 (01) :8-29
[10]  
King CR, 2000, INT J CANCER, V90, P305, DOI 10.1002/1097-0215(20001220)90:6<305::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO