Quantitative gas chromatography-olfactometry carried out at different dilutions of an extract.: Key differences in the odor profiles of four high-quality Spanish aged red wines

被引:105
作者
Ferreira, V [1 ]
Aznar, M [1 ]
López, R [1 ]
Cacho, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Fac Sci, Dept Analyt Chem, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
gas chromatography-olfactometry; wine; aroma; flavor;
D O I
10.1021/jf010283u
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Four Spanish aged red wines made in different wine-making areas have been extracted, and the extracts and their 1:5, 1:50, and 1:500 dilutions have been analyzed by a gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) approach in which three judges evaluated odor intensity on a four-point scale. Sixty-nine different odor regions were detected in the GC-O profiles of wines, 63 of which could be identified. GC-O data have been processed to calculate averaged flavor dilution factors (FD). Different ANOVA strategies have been further applied on FD and on intensity data to check for significant differences among wines and to assess the effects of dilution and the judge. Data show that FD and the average intensity of the odorants are strongly correlated (r(2) = 0.892). However, the measurement of intensity represents a quantitative advantage in terms of detecting differences. For some odorants, dilution exerts a critical role in the detection of differences. Significant differences among wines have been found in 30 of the 69 odorants detected in the experiment. Most of these differences are introduced by grape compounds such as methyl benzoate and terpenols, by compounds released by the wood, such as furfural, (Z)-whiskey lactone, Furaneol, 4-propylguaiacol, eugenol, 4-ethylphenol, 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, isoeugenol, and ethyl vanillate, by compounds formed by lactic acid bacteria, such as 2,3-butanedione and acetoine, or by compounds formed during the oxidative storage of wines, such as methional, sotolon, o-aminoacetophenone, and phenylacetic acid. The most important differences from a quantitative point of view are due to 2-methyl-3-mercaptofuran, 4-propylguaiacol, 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, and isoeugenol.
引用
收藏
页码:4818 / 4824
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Critical comparison of three olfactometric methods for the identification of the most potent odorants in cooked mussels (Mytilus edulis)
    Le Guen, S
    Prost, C
    Demaimay, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2000, 48 (04) : 1307 - 1314
  • [22] GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY OLFACTOMETRY OF ORANGE JUICE TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF PLASTIC POLYMERS ON AROMA CHARACTER
    MARIN, AB
    ACREE, TE
    HOTCHKISS, JH
    NAGY, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1992, 40 (04) : 650 - 654
  • [23] McDaniel M. R., 1990, FLAVORS OFF FLAVORS, P23
  • [24] ODOR ANALYSIS OF PINOT-NOIR WINES FROM GRAPES OF DIFFERENT MATURITIES BY A GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY OLFACTOMETRY TECHNIQUE (OSME)
    MIRANDALOPEZ, R
    LIBBEY, LM
    WATSON, BT
    MCDANIEL, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1992, 57 (04) : 985 - &
  • [25] Mistry BS., 1997, TECHNIQUES ANAL FOOD, P265
  • [26] Montgomery D. C., 1991, DESIGN ANAL EXPT
  • [27] Comparison of key odorants generated by thermal treatment of commercial and self-prepared yeast extracts: Influence of the amino acid composition on odorant formation
    Munch, P
    Hofmann, T
    Schieberle, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (04) : 1338 - 1344
  • [28] PHAM TT, 1995, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V43, P2616
  • [29] Hyphenated headspace gas chromatography sniffing technique: Screening of impact odorants and quantitative aromagram comparisons
    Pollien, P
    Ott, A
    Montigon, F
    Baumgartner, M
    MunozBox, R
    Chaintreau, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (07) : 2630 - 2637
  • [30] First attempt of odorant quantitation using gas chromatography-olfactometry
    Pollien, P
    Fay, LB
    Baumgartner, M
    Chaintreau, A
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (23) : 5391 - 5397