Predicting the World Cup 2002 in soccer: Performance and confidence of experts and non-experts

被引:72
作者
Andersson, P
Edman, J
Ekman, M
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Ctr Econ Psychol, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Penn State Univ, Commonwealth Coll, Div Business & Econ, Dunmore, PA 18512 USA
[3] Stockholm Hlth Econ, S-11121 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
experts; judgmental forecasting; overconfidence; sports forecasting;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2005.03.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the forecasting performance and confidence of experts and non-experts. 251 participants with four different levels of knowledge of soccer (ranging between expertise and almost ignorance) took part in a survey and predicted the outcome of the first round of World Cup 2002. The participating experts (i.e., sport journalists, soccer fans, and soccer coaches) and the non-experts were found to be equally accurate and better than chance. A simple prediction rule that followed world rankings outperformed most participants. Experts overestimated their performance and tended to be overconfident, while the opposite tendency was observed for the participants with limited knowledge. Providing non-experts with information did not improve their performance, but increased their confidence. (c) 2005 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 576
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
GIGERENZER G, 1994, SUBJECTIVE PROBABILI, P130
[22]   Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic [J].
Goldstein, DG ;
Gigerenzer, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2002, 109 (01) :75-90
[23]   Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy [J].
Grove, WM ;
Meehl, PE .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 1996, 2 (02) :293-323
[24]   TIMID CHOICES AND BOLD FORECASTS - A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON RISK-TAKING [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
LOVALLO, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (01) :17-31
[26]   Winning on the horses: How much strategy and knowledge are needed? [J].
Ladouceur, R ;
Giroux, I ;
Jacques, C .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 132 (02) :133-142
[27]   Assessing the forecasters: an analysis of the forecasting records of the Treasury, the London Business School and the National Institute [J].
Mills, TC ;
Pepper, GT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1999, 15 (03) :247-257
[28]   PROBABILITY FORECASTING IN METEOROLOGY [J].
MURPHY, AH ;
WINKLER, RL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 79 (387) :489-500
[29]   On the role of recognition in decision making [J].
Newell, BR ;
Shanks, DR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (04) :923-935
[30]   Professional vs. amateur judgment accuracy:: The case of foreign exchange rates [J].
Önkal, D ;
Yates, JF ;
Simga-Mugan, C ;
Öztin, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 91 (02) :169-185