Abatement technology investment and emissions trading system: a case of coal-fired power industry of Shenzhen, China

被引:27
作者
Huang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Lei [3 ,4 ]
Ma, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Xiaofeng [5 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Sch Environm & Energy, Key Lab Urban Habitat Environm Sci & Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[4] European Univ Inst, Robert Schuman Ctr Adv Studies, Florence, Italy
[5] Shenzhen Environm Monitoring Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Shenzhen emissions trading system; Coal-fired power industry; Abatement technology investment; Benefit-cost analysis; IMPACTS; PRICES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-014-0854-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As one of China's emissions trading system (ETS) pilots, Shenzhen established the first carbon market of China in 2013. With field data collection and benefit-cost analysis, this article assesses the abatement technology investment decisions of Shenzhen coal-fired power industry under different carbon price scenarios. The results indicate that Shenzhen ETS constitutes a main driver for the short-term technology investment of the industry, but the long-term stimulation effect appears quite limited, except for the integrated gasification combined cycle technology under high carbon price scenario. Further, the paper proposes the short-term and long-term optimal investment strategy for the industry, and relevant policy suggestions.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 817
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Carbon pricing and electricity market reforms in China
    Fan, Jin
    Zhao, Dingtao
    Wu, Yanrui
    Wei, Jiuchang
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2014, 16 (05) : 921 - 933
  • [22] Cap and trade finds new energy
    Grubb, Michael
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 491 (7426) : 666 - 667
  • [23] Analysis of the technical, microeconomic, and political impact of a carbon tax on carbon dioxide sequestration resulting from liquefied natural gas production
    Hasaneen, Rasha
    Elsayed, Nesreen A.
    Barrufet, Maria A.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2014, 16 (08) : 1597 - 1613
  • [24] Hoffmann Volker H., 2007, European Management Journal, V25, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2007.07.008
  • [25] Can the future EU ETS support wind energy investments?
    Isabel Blanco, Maria
    Rodrigues, Gloria
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (04) : 1509 - 1520
  • [26] Emissions trading and investment decisions in the power sector - a case study in Finland
    Laurikka, H
    Koljonen, T
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (09) : 1063 - 1074
  • [27] Option value of gasification technology within an emissions trading scheme
    Laurikka, Harri
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) : 3916 - 3928
  • [28] Emissions trading in China: A conceptual 'leapfrog' approach?
    Raufer, Roger
    Li, Shaoyi
    [J]. ENERGY, 2009, 34 (07) : 904 - 912
  • [29] Exergetic analysis and evaluation of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant
    Reddy, V. Siva
    Kaushik, S. C.
    Tyagi, S. K.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2014, 16 (03) : 489 - 499
  • [30] Assessing the effects of CO2 price caps on electricity investments-A real options analysis
    Szolgayova, Jana
    Fuss, Sabine
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) : 3974 - 3981