Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging

被引:172
作者
Frayne, R
Goodyear, BG
Dickhoff, P
Lauzon, ML
Sevick, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Foothills Med Ctr, Seaman Family MR Res Ctr, Calgary Hlth Reg, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Radiol, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
关键词
magnetic resonance; very high field MR; 3.0 T MR; technical issues; neuroradiology;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000073442.88269.c9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
MR imaging at very high field (3.0 T) is a significant new clinical tool in the modem neuroradiological armamentarium. In this report, we summarize our 40-month experience in performing clinical neuroradiological examinations at 3.0 T and review the relevant technical issues. We report on these issues and, where appropriate, their solutions. Issues examined include: increased SNR, larger chemical shifts, additional problems associated with installation of these scanners, challenges in designing and obtaining appropriate clinical imaging coils, greater acoustic noise, increased power deposition, changes in relaxation rates and susceptibility effects, and issues surrounding the safety and compatibility of implanted devices. Some of the these technical factors are advantageous (eg, increased signal-to-noise ratio), some are detrimental (eg, installation, coil design and development, acoustic noise, power deposition, device compatibility, and safety), and a few have both benefits and disadvantages (eg, changes in relaxation, chemical shift, and susceptibility). Fortunately solutions have been developed or are currently under development, by us and by others, for nearly all of these challenges. A short series of 1.5 T and 3.0 T patient images are also presented to illustrate the potential diagnostic benefits of scanning at higher field strengths. In summary, by paying appropriate attention to the discussed technical issues, high-quality neuro-imaging of patients is possible at 3.0 T.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 402
页数:18
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [11] Bernstein MA, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P955, DOI 10.1002/mrm.1282
  • [12] BERNSTEIN MA, 2000, P INT SOC MAG RESON, V8, P1994
  • [13] Bomsdorf H, 1988, NMR Biomed, V1, P151, DOI 10.1002/nbm.1940010308
  • [14] BOTTOMLEY PA, 1984, MED PHYS, V11, P425, DOI 10.1118/1.595535
  • [15] Sampling and evaluation of specific absorption rates during patient examinations performed on 1.5-Tesla MR systems
    Brix, G
    Reinl, M
    Brinker, G
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 19 (06) : 769 - 779
  • [16] Campeau N G, 2001, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V12, P183, DOI 10.1097/00002142-200106000-00005
  • [17] Chen CN, 1989, BIOMEDICAL MAGNETIC
  • [18] Compensating for B1 inhomogeneity using active transmit power modulation
    Clare, S
    Alecci, M
    Jezzard, P
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 19 (10) : 1349 - 1352
  • [19] PERFUSION AND DIFFUSION MR-IMAGING OF THROMBOEMBOLIC STROKE
    DECRESPIGNY, AJ
    TSUURA, M
    MOSELEY, ME
    KUCHARCZYK, J
    [J]. JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (05): : 746 - 754
  • [20] FELMLEE JP, 2000, P INT SOC MAGN RESON, V8, P8