Evaluation of optimization methods for nonrigid medical image registration using mutual information and B-splines

被引:317
作者
Klein, Stefan [1 ]
Staring, Marius [1 ]
Pluim, Josien P. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Imaging Sci Inst, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
B-splines; mutual information; nonrigid image registration; optimization; subsampling;
D O I
10.1109/TIP.2007.909412
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A popular technique for nonrigid registration of medical images is based on the maximization of their mutual information, in combination with a deformation field parameterized by cubic B-splines. The coordinate mapping that relates the two images is found using an iterative optimization procedure. This work compares the performance of eight optimization methods: gradient descent (with two different step size selection algorithms), quasi-Newton, nonlinear conjugate gradient, Kiefer-Wolfowitz, simultaneous perturbation, Robbins-Monro, and evolution strategy. Special attention is paid to computation time reduction by using fewer voxels to calculate the cost function and its derivatives. The optimization methods are tested on manually deformed CT images of the heart, on follow-up CT chest scans, and on MR scans of the prostate acquired using a BFFE, T1, and T2 protocol. Registration accuracy is assessed by computing the overlap of segmented edges. Precision and convergence properties are studied by comparing deformation fields. The results show that the Robbins-Monro method is the best choice in most applications. With this approach, the computation time per iteration can be lowered approximately 500 times without affecting the rate of convergence by using a small subset of the image, randomly selected in every iteration, to compute the derivative of the mutual information. From the other methods the quasi-Newton and the nonlinear conjugate gradient method achieve a slightly higher precision, at the price of larger computation times.
引用
收藏
页码:2879 / 2890
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   MEASURES OF THE AMOUNT OF ECOLOGIC ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SPECIES [J].
DICE, LR .
ECOLOGY, 1945, 26 (03) :297-302
[12]   ON ASYMPTOTIC NORMALITY IN STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION [J].
FABIAN, V .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1968, 39 (04) :1327-&
[13]   Semiautomatic nonrigid registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes [J].
Fei, BW ;
Duerk, JL ;
Sodee, DB ;
Wilson, DL .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (07) :815-824
[14]   A unified approach to fast image registration and a new curvature based registration technique [J].
Fischer, B ;
Modersitzki, J .
LINEAR ALGEBRA AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2004, 380 :107-124
[15]   Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy [J].
Foskey, M ;
Davis, B ;
Goyal, L ;
Chang, S ;
Chaney, E ;
Strehl, N ;
Tomei, S ;
Rosenman, J ;
Joshi, S .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (24) :5869-5892
[16]   Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies [J].
Hansen, N ;
Ostermeier, A .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2001, 9 (02) :159-195
[17]   METHODS OF CONJUGATE GRADIENTS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS [J].
HESTENES, MR ;
STIEFEL, E .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, 1952, 49 (06) :409-436
[18]   Automatic lung segmentation for accurate quantitation of volumetric X-ray CT images [J].
Hu, SY ;
Hoffman, EA ;
Reinhardt, JM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (06) :490-498
[19]   A note on Q-order of convergence [J].
Jay, LO .
BIT NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2001, 41 (02) :422-429
[20]   STOCHASTIC ESTIMATION OF THE MAXIMUM OF A REGRESSION FUNCTION [J].
KIEFER, J ;
WOLFOWITZ, J .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1952, 23 (03) :462-466