Clinical implementation of dynamic and step-and-shoot IMRT to treat prostate cancer with high risk of pelvic lymph node involvement

被引:45
作者
Adams, EJ
Convery, DJ
Cosgrove, VP
McNair, HA
Staffurth, JN
Vaarkamp, J
Nutting, CM
Warrington, AP
Webb, S
Balyckyi, J
Dearnaley, DP
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
intensity-modulated radiotherapy; prostate; dose escalation;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2003.09.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Two systems have been developed for treating patients with locally advanced prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT): one using dynamic multi-leaf collimator delivery and the other using step-and-shoot. This paper describes the clinical implementation of these two techniques, and presents results from the first 14 patients treated in a clinical setting (nine dynamic, five step-and-shoot). Patients and methods: Dynamic treatments were planned using Corvus, and step-and-shoot using Helax-TMS; all were delivered using Elekta accelerators. Prior to the first clinical treatments, validation measurements were carried out for each system, including measurements for a complete IMRT treatment. The reproducibility of dynamic delivery and the characteristics of the accelerator for low-monitor-unit (MU) deliveries were also assessed. An extensive quality assurance (QA) program was performed for each of the patients. Additionally, timing measurements were carried out to assess the practicalities of the technique. Results: The planning objectives were met in most cases. Absolute doses for complete IMRT treatments were within 2%, on average, with dose distributions generally showing agreement within 3% or 3 mm. Beam modulation measurements made throughout each patient's treatment indicated that both delivery methods were reproducible. The dynamic plans required an average of 765 MU per beam, with a treatment delivery time of 14 min; corresponding results for step-and-shoot plans were 105 MU and 10 min. Conclusions: Two IMRT techniques for this group of patients have been successfully implemented in the clinic. The more complex dynamic treatments showed no advantages over the step-and-shoot approach. QA results have shown accurate and reproducible delivery for both techniques, giving increased confidence in the techniques and allowing a reduction in the QA program. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Requirements for leaf position accuracy for dynamic multileaf collimation [J].
Budgell, GJ ;
Mott, JHL ;
Williams, PC ;
Brown, KJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (05) :1211-1227
[2]   Improved delivery efficiency for step and shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy using a fast-tuning magnetron [J].
Budgell, GJ ;
Martens, C ;
Claus, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (11) :N253-N261
[3]  
Clark C H, 2002, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V3, P273, DOI 10.1120/1.1499095
[4]   Generation of discrete beam-intensity modulation by dynamic multileaf collimation under minimum leaf separation constraints [J].
Convery, DJ ;
Webb, S .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (09) :2521-2538
[5]  
Convery DJ, 2000, USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, P277
[6]   The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions [J].
Deng, J ;
Pawlicki, T ;
Chen, Y ;
Li, JS ;
Jiang, SB ;
Ma, CM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (04) :1039-1060
[7]  
FIELDING AL, 2001, RADIOTHER ONCOL S1, V61, pS26
[8]   EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
GOLIMBU, M ;
MORALES, P ;
ALASKARI, S ;
BROWN, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1979, 121 (05) :617-620
[9]   A GENERALIZED PENCIL BEAM ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMIZATION OF RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
GUSTAFSSON, A ;
LIND, BK ;
BRAHME, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (03) :343-357
[10]  
GUSTAFSSON A, 1998, MED PHYS, V25, pA117