Implementing the delta-four-stream approximation for solar radiation computations in an atmosphere general circulation model

被引:11
作者
Ayash, Tarek [1 ]
Gong, Sunling [2 ]
Jia, Charles Q. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Chem Engn & Appl Chem, Toronto, ON M5S 3E5, Canada
[2] Meteorol Serv Canada, Air Qual Res Branch, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Chem Engn & Appl Chem, Toronto, ON M5S 3E5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2007JAS2526.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Proper quantification of the solar radiation budget and its transfer within the atmosphere is of utmost importance in climate modeling. The delta-four-stream (DFS) approximation has been demonstrated to offer a more accurate computational method of quantifying the budget than the simple two-stream approximations widely used in general circulation models (GCMs) for radiative-transfer computations. Based on this method, the relative improvement in the accuracy of solar flux computations is investigated in the simulations of the third-generation Canadian Climate Center atmosphere GCM. Relative to the computations of the DFS-modified radiation scheme, the GCM original-scheme whole-sky fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) show the largest underestimations at high latitudes of a winter hemisphere on the order of 4%-6% (monthly means), while the largest overestimations of the same order are found over equatorial regions. At the surface, even higher overestimations are found, exceeding 20% at subpolar regions of a winter hemisphere. Flux differences between original and DFS schemes are largest in the tropics and at high latitudes, where the monthly zonal means and their dispersions are within 5 W m(-2) at the TOA and 10 W m(-2) at the surface in whole sky, but differences may be as large as 20 and -40 W m(-2). In clear sky, monthly zonal means and their dispersions remain within 2 W m(-2), but may be as large as 25 and -12 W m(-2). Such differences are found to be mostly determined by variations in cloud optical depth and solar zenith angle, and by aerosol loading in a clear sky.
引用
收藏
页码:2448 / 2457
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   INTERCOMPARING SHORTWAVE RADIATION CODES FOR CLIMATE STUDIES [J].
FOUQUART, Y ;
BONNEL, B ;
RAMASWAMY, V .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1991, 96 (D5) :8955-8968
[12]  
FU Q, 1993, J ATMOS SCI, V50, P2008, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2008:POTRPO>2.0.CO
[13]  
2
[14]   Canadian Aerosol Module: A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models - 1. Module development [J].
Gong, SL ;
Barrie, LA ;
Blanchet, JP ;
von Salzen, K ;
Lohmann, U ;
Lesins, G ;
Spacek, L ;
Zhang, LM ;
Girard, E ;
Lin, H ;
Leaitch, R ;
Leighton, H ;
Chylek, P ;
Huang, P .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D1)
[15]   Intercomparison of shortwave radiative transfer codes and measurements [J].
Halthore, RN ;
Crisp, D ;
Schwartz, SE ;
Anderson, GP ;
Berk, A ;
Bonnel, B ;
Boucher, O ;
Chang, FL ;
Chou, MD ;
Clothiaux, EE ;
Dubuisson, P ;
Fomin, B ;
Fouquart, Y ;
Freidenreich, S ;
Gautier, C ;
Kato, S ;
Laszlo, I ;
Li, Z ;
Mather, JH ;
Plana-Fattori, A ;
Ramaswamy, V ;
Ricchiazzi, P ;
Shiren, Y ;
Trishchenko, A ;
Wiscombe, W .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2005, 110 (D11) :1-18
[16]   SEASONAL-VARIATION OF CLOUD RADIATIVE FORCING DERIVED FROM THE EARTH RADIATION BUDGET EXPERIMENT [J].
HARRISON, EF ;
MINNIS, P ;
BARKSTROM, BR ;
RAMANATHAN, V ;
CESS, RD ;
GIBSON, GG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D11) :18687-18703
[17]  
JOSEPH JH, 1976, J ATMOS SCI, V33, P2452, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<2452:TDEAFR>2.0.CO
[18]  
2
[19]  
Kay MJ, 2001, J ATMOS SCI, V58, P3752, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<3752:AFANFC>2.0.CO
[20]  
2