Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning?

被引:200
作者
Janssen, Jeroen [1 ]
Erkens, Gijsbert [1 ]
Kanselaar, Gellof [1 ]
Jaspers, Jos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Res Ctr Learning Interact, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
cooperative/collaborative learning; computer-mediated communication; distributed learning environments; secondary education; pedagogical issues;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effects of visualization of participation during computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). It is hypothesized that visualization of participation could contribute to successful CSCL. A CSCL-environment was augmented with the Participation Tool (PT). The PT visualizes how much each group member contributes to his or her group's online communication. Using a posttest-only design with a treatment (N = 52) and a control group (N = 17), it was examined whether students with access to the PT participated more and more equally during collaboration, reported higher awareness of group processes and activities, collaborated differently, and performed better than students without access to the PT. The results show that students used the PT quite intensively. Furthermore, compared to control group students, treatment group students participated more and engaged more in coordination and regulation of social activities during collaboration by sending more statements that addressed the planning of social activities. However, equality of participation, awareness of group processes and quality of the group products was not higher in the treatment condition. Still, the results of this study demonstrate that visualization of participation can contribute to successful CSCL. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1065
页数:29
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Research on cooperative learning and achievement: Comments on Slavin [J].
Abrami, PC ;
Chambers, B .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 21 (01) :70-79
[2]   Gender and computer-mediated communication: group processes in problem solving [J].
Adrianson, L .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 17 (01) :71-94
[3]  
ALKER HAYWARD, 1965, MATH POLITICS
[4]  
Artzt AF., 1997, J MATH BEHAV, V16, P63, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90008-0
[5]   Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis [J].
Baltes, BB ;
Dickson, MW ;
Sherman, MP ;
Bauer, CC ;
LaGanke, JS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 87 (01) :156-179
[6]   An experimental analysis of face to face versus computer mediated communication channels [J].
Barkhi, R ;
Jacob, VS ;
Pirkul, H .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1999, 8 (04) :325-347
[7]   A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making [J].
Benbunan-Fich, R ;
Hiltz, SR ;
Turoff, M .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2003, 34 (04) :457-469
[8]   The analysis of participation in small groups - Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence [J].
Bonito, JA .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (04) :412-438
[9]   The effect of contributing substantively on perceptions of participation [J].
Bonito, JA .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (05) :528-553
[10]  
BUTLER DL, 1995, REV EDUC RES, V65, P245, DOI 10.3102/00346543065003245