Predator inspection behaviour in a characin fish: an interaction between chemical and visual information?

被引:59
作者
Brown, GE [1 ]
Magnavacca, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00919.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent evidence suggests that predator inspection behaviour by Ostariophysan prey fishes is regulated by both the chemical and visual cues of potential predators. In laboratory trials, we assessed the relative importance of chemical and visual information during inspection visits by varying both ambient light (visual cues) and predator odour (chemical cues) in a 2 x 2 experimental design. Shoals of glowlight tetras (Hemigrammus erythrozonus) were exposed to a live convict cichlid (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus) predator under low ( 3 lux) or high (50 lux) light levels and in the presence of the odour of a cichild fed tetras (with an alarm cue) or swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri, with an alarm cue not recognized by tetras). Tetras exhibited threat-sensitive inspection behaviour (increased latency to inspect, reduced frequency of inspection, smaller inspecting group sizes and increased minimum approach distance) towards a predator paired with a tetra-fed diet cue, regardless of light levels. Similar threat-sensitive inspection patterns were observed towards cichlids paired with a swordtail-fed diet cue only under high light conditions. Our data suggest that chemical cues in the form of prey alarm cues in the diet of the predator, are the primary source of information regarding local predation risk during inspection behaviour, and that visual cues are used when chemical information is unavailable or ambiguous.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 750
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata [J].
Godin, JGJ ;
Dugatkin, LA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (19) :10262-10267
[22]   Sensory compensation and the detection of predators: the interaction between chemical and visual information [J].
Hartman, EJ ;
Abrahams, MV .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1443) :571-575
[23]   The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals [J].
Kats, LB ;
Dill, LM .
ECOSCIENCE, 1998, 5 (03) :361-394
[24]  
LICHT T, 1989, ETHOLOGY, V82, P238
[25]   POPULATION DIFFERENCES IN PREDATOR RECOGNITION AND ATTACK CONE AVOIDANCE IN THE GUPPY POECILIA-RETICULATA [J].
MAGURRAN, AE ;
SEGHERS, BH .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1990, 40 :443-452
[26]  
MAGURRAN AE, 1990, ANN ZOOL FENN, V27, P51
[27]   CHEMICAL ALARM SIGNALS INCREASE THE SURVIVAL-TIME OF FATHEAD MINNOWS (PIMEPHALES-PROMELAS) DURING ENCOUNTERS WITH NORTHERN PIKE (ESOX-LUCIUS) [J].
MATHIS, A ;
SMITH, RJF .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1993, 4 (03) :260-265
[28]   Differential responses of male and female red swordtails to chemical alarm cues [J].
Mirza, RS ;
Scott, JJ ;
Chivers, DP .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2001, 59 (03) :716-728
[29]   Predator attack motivation influences the inspection behaviour of European minnows [J].
Murphy, KE ;
Pitcher, TJ .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (02) :407-417
[30]   WHO DARES, WINS - THE FUNCTION AND EVOLUTION OF PREDATOR INSPECTION BEHAVIOR IN SHOALING FISH [J].
PITCHER, T .
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1992, 42 (2-3) :371-391