Generalizations of the familywise error rate

被引:208
作者
Lehmann, EL [1 ]
Romano, JP
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Stat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
familywise error rate; multiple testing; p-value; stepdown procedure;
D O I
10.1214/009053605000000084
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
H-1,..., H-s. The usual approach to dealing with the multiplicity problem is to restrict attention to procedures that control the familywise error rate (FWER), the probability of even one false rejection. In many applications, particularly if s is large, one might be willing to tolerate more than one false rejection provided the number of such cases is controlled, thereby increasing the ability of the procedure to detect false null hypotheses. This suggests replacing control of the FWER by controlling the probability of k or more false rejections, which we call the k-FWER. We derive both single-step and stepdown procedures that control the k-FWER, without making any assumptions concerning the dependence structure of the p-values of the individual tests. In particular, we derive a stepdown procedure that is quite simple to apply, and prove that it cannot be improved without violation of control of the k-FWER. We also consider the false discovery proportion (FDP) defined by the number of false rejections divided by the total number of rejections (defined to be 0 if there are no rejections). The false discovery rate proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg [J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 (1995) 289-300] controls E(FDP). Here, we construct methods such that, for any gamma and alpha, P{FDP > gamma <= alpha. Two stepdown methods are proposed. The first holds under mild conditions on the dependence structure of p-values, while the second is more conservative but holds without any dependence assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:1138 / 1154
页数:17
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MULTIPLE COMP PROCED, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470316672
[2]  
Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
[3]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[4]   A stochastic process approach to false discovery control [J].
Genovese, C ;
Wasserman, L .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2004, 32 (03) :1035-1061
[5]  
HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
[6]  
Hommel G, 1988, MULTIPLE HYPOTHESES, P154
[7]  
Hommel G., 1983, Biometrical Journal, V25, P423, DOI [10.1002/bimj.19830250502, DOI 10.1002/BIMJ.19830250502]
[8]   Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data [J].
Korn, EL ;
Troendle, JF ;
McShane, LM ;
Simon, R .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2004, 124 (02) :379-398
[9]   False discovery control for random fields \ [J].
Pacifico, MP ;
Genovese, C ;
Verdinelli, I ;
Wasserman, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 99 (468) :1002-1014
[10]  
Sarkar SK, 1998, ANN STAT, V26, P494