The Effects of Institutional Distance and Headquarters' Financial Performance on the Generation of Environmental Standards in Multinational Companies

被引:72
作者
Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier [1 ]
Alberto Aragon-Correa, Juan [1 ]
Esther Hurtado-Torres, Nuria [1 ]
Rugman, Alan M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Henley On Thames RG9 3AU, Oxon, England
关键词
Natural environment; Multinational company; Environmental standardization; Environmental institutional distance between countries; Financial performance; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FIRM SELF-REGULATION; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; NATURAL-ENVIRONMENT; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; GREEN MANAGEMENT; DETERMINANTS; STRATEGY; ADOPTION; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-011-0978-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article combines institutional and resources' arguments to show that the institutional distance between the home and the host country, and the headquarters' financial performance have a relevant impact on the environmental standardization decision in multinational companies. Using a sample of 135 multinational companies in three different industries with headquarters and subsidiaries based in the USA, Canada, Mexico, France, and Spain, we find that a high environmental institutional distance between headquarters' and subsidiaries' countries deters the standardization of environmental practices. On the other hand, high-profit headquarters are willing to standardize their environmental practices, rather than taking advantage of countries with lax environmental protection to undertake more pollution-intensive activities. Finally, we show that headquarters' financial performance also imposes a moderating effect on the relationship between environmental institutional distance between countries and environmental standardization within the multinational company.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 474
页数:14
相关论文
共 111 条
[71]  
Niemeijer D., 2002, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V5, P91, DOI [10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00026-6, DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00026-6]
[72]   Is slack good or bad for innovation? [J].
Nohria, N ;
Gulati, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1245-1264
[73]   STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES [J].
OLIVER, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1991, 16 (01) :145-179
[74]  
Oliver C, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P697, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO
[75]  
2-C
[76]   Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Orlitzky, M ;
Schmidt, FL ;
Rynes, SL .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2003, 24 (03) :403-441
[77]   Institutional exceptions on global projects: a process model [J].
Orr, Ryan J. ;
Scott, W. Richard .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2008, 39 (04) :562-588
[78]   An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies [J].
Peng, Mike W. ;
Wang, Denis Y. L. ;
Jiang, Yi .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2008, 39 (05) :920-936
[79]  
Pinkse Jonatan, 2007, European Management Journal, V25, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2007.07.003
[80]   Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge, Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions [J].
Plaza-Ubeda, Jose A. ;
de Burgos-Jimenez, Jeroimo ;
Carmona-Moreno, Eva .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 93 (03) :419-442