High-level arsenite removal from groundwater by zero-valent iron

被引:183
作者
Lien, HL
Wilkin, RT
机构
[1] Natl Univ Kaohsiung, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan
[2] US Environm Protect Agcy Off Res & Dev, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Ada, OK 74820 USA
关键词
arsenic; zero-valent iron; groundwater remediation; permeable reactive barriers;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.055
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to conduct batch and column studies to (i) assess the effectiveness of zero-valent iron for arsenic remediation in groundwater, (ii) determine removal mechanisms of arsenic, and (iii) evaluate implications of these processes with regard to the stability of arsenic and long-term remedial performance of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technology. A high concentration arsenic solution (50 mg l(-1)) was prepared by using sodium arsenite (arsenic (III)) to simulate groundwater at a heavily contaminated Superfund site in the USA. Batch studies indicate that the removal of arsenic is a two-step reaction with fast initial disappearance of arsenite followed by a slow subsequent removal process. Flow-through columns were conducted at a flow rate of 17 ml h(-1) under reducing conditions for 6.6 mo. Kinetic analysis suggested that arsenic removal behaves as a zero-order reaction at high arsenic concentrations. Arsenic removal rate constants decreased with time and arsenic breakthrough was observed in the column study. Arsenic removal capacity of zero-valent iron was determined to be approximately 7.5 mg As/g Fe. Carbonate green rust was identified from the analysis of surface precipitates; arsenite uptake by green rust may be a major mechanism responsible for arsenic remediation by zero-valent iron. Analysis of HCl-extractable arsenic from iron samples indicated that approximately 28% of arsenic was in the form of arsenate suggesting that a surface oxidation process was involved in the arsenic removal with zero-valent iron. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 386
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   Significance of iron(II,III) hydroxycarbonate green rust in arsenic remediation using zerovalent him in laboratory column tests [J].
Su, CM ;
Puls, RW .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (19) :5224-5231
[32]   Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: Effects of phosphate, silicate, carbonate, borate, sulfate, chromate, molybdate, and nitrate, relative to chloride [J].
Su, CM ;
Puls, RW .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (22) :4562-4568
[33]   Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: Kinetics, redox transformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation [J].
Su, CM ;
Puls, RW .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (07) :1487-1492
[34]  
U.S. EPA, 1997, Technology Alternatives for the Remediation of Soils Contaminated with as, Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb EPA/540/S-97/500
[35]  
VANGENUCHTEN MT, 1981, CFITIM
[36]   Performance evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier for remediation of dissolved chlorinated solvents in groundwater [J].
Vogan, JL ;
Focht, RM ;
Clark, DK ;
Graham, SL .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1999, 68 (1-2) :97-108
[37]   ARSENIC IN GROUND-WATER OF THE WESTERN UNITED-STATES [J].
WELCH, AH ;
LICO, MS ;
HUGHES, JL .
GROUND WATER, 1988, 26 (03) :333-347
[38]   Long-term performance of permeable reactive barriers using zero-valent iron: Geochemical and microbiological effects [J].
Wilkin, RT ;
Puls, RW ;
Sewell, GW .
GROUND WATER, 2003, 41 (04) :493-503