Mini-incision versus mini-incision and computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: A radiological prospective randomised study

被引:14
作者
Confalonieni, Norberto [1 ]
Manzotti, Alfonso [1 ]
Pullen, Chris [2 ]
Ragone, Vincenza [3 ]
机构
[1] CTO, ICP, Orthopaed Dept 1, Milan, Italy
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[3] Politecn Univ, Dept Engn, Milan, Italy
关键词
total knee replacement; mini-incision; knee arthroplasty; computer-assisted surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2007.07.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this trial was to compare the radiological results of 74 patients undergoing a mini-invasive total knee replacement (TKR) using either a traditional alignment guide (MIS group) or a computer assisted alignment system (MICA group). All the patients were prospectively randomised to either group and the same implant was used for both groups. At 8 months post-operatively, the frontal femoral component angle (FFC), the frontal tibial component angle (FTC), the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation of components (slopes) were evaluated respectively. The slopes of the femoral component and the FTC angle were statistically better aligned in the MICA group (p<0.001). The MICA group showed both a significant fewer number of outliners and a significant higher number of implants with all five radiological parameters ideally aligned. The operative time was statistically longer in the computer assisted group. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 447
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Bal B Sonny, 2006, J Bone Joint Surg Am, V88 Suppl 1 Pt 2, P221, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.F.00326
[2]
Alignment in total knee arthroplasty -: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Lüring, C ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Grifka, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (05) :682-687
[3]
Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Berend, ME ;
Ritter, MA ;
Meding, JB ;
Faris, PM ;
Keating, EM ;
Redelman, R ;
Faris, GW ;
Davis, KE .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (428) :26-34
[4]
Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique [J].
Berger, RA ;
Sanders, S ;
Gerlinger, T ;
Della Valle, C ;
Jacobs, JJ ;
Rosenberg, AG .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07) :33-38
[5]
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[6]
Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement - The initial experience with results at two to four years [J].
Chen, A. F. ;
Alan, R. K. ;
Redziniak, D. E. ;
Tria, A. J., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (11) :1448-1453
[7]
Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique [J].
Chin, PL ;
Yang, KY ;
Yeo, SJ ;
Lo, NN .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (05) :618-626
[8]
Confalonieri Norberto, 2005, Acta Orthop Belg, V71, P703
[9]
Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment [J].
Dalury, DF ;
Dennis, DA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (440) :77-81
[10]
ECKER ML, 1997, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V216, P151