The influence of specimen attachment and dimension on microtensile strength

被引:58
作者
El Zohairy, AA
de Gee, AJ
de Jager, N
van Ruijven, LJ
Feilzer, AJ
机构
[1] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, Dept Dent Mat Sci, NL-1066 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, Dept Funct Anat, NL-1066 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
finite element analysis; microtensile bond strength; microtensile strength; composite;
D O I
10.1177/154405910408300513
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The higher microtensile bond strength values found for specimens with a smaller cross-sectional area are often explained by the lower occurrence of internal defects and surface flaws. We hypothesized that this aberrant behavior is mainly caused by the lateral way of attachment of the specimens to the testing device, which makes the strength dependent on the thickness. This study showed that composite bars of 1x1x10, 1x2x10, and 1x3x10mm attached at their 1-mm-wide side (situation A) fractured at loads of the same magnitude, as a result of which the microtensile strength (muTS), calculated as F/A (force at fracture/cross-sectional area), significantly increased for specimens with decreasing thickness. Attachment at the 1-, 2-, or 3-mm-wide side (situation B) resulted in equal muTS values (P > 0.05). Finite element analysis showed different stress patterns for situation A, but comparable patterns for situation B. Both situations showed the same maximum stress at fracture.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 424
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
CRAIG RG, 2002, RESTORATIVE DENT MAT, P78
[2]   3-DIMENSIONAL FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE SHEAR BOND TEST [J].
DEHOFF, PH ;
ANUSAVICE, KJ ;
WANG, ZX .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (02) :126-131
[3]   SHEAR VS TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE BONDED TO CERAMIC [J].
DELLABONA, A ;
VANNOORT, R .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (09) :1591-1596
[4]   BOND STRENGTH OF 6 DENTINAL ADHESIVES [J].
HOLTAN, JR ;
NYSTROM, GP ;
OLIN, PS ;
PHELPS, RA ;
PHILLIPS, JJ ;
DOUGLAS, WH .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1994, 22 (02) :92-96
[5]   IN-VITRO QUALITY TESTING OF DENTIN ADHESIVES [J].
OILO, G ;
AUSTRHEIM, EK .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 51 (04) :263-269
[6]   The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test [J].
Phrukkanon, S ;
Burrow, MF ;
Tyas, MJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (03) :212-221
[7]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURFACE-AREA FOR ADHESION AND TENSILE BOND STRENGTH - EVALUATION OF A MICRO-TENSILE BOND TEST [J].
SANO, H ;
SHONO, T ;
SONODA, H ;
TAKATSU, T ;
CIUCCHI, B ;
CARVALHO, R ;
PASHLEY, DH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1994, 10 (04) :236-240
[8]   ANALYSIS OF THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF PRETREATED AGED COMPOSITES USED IN SOME INDIRECT BONDING TECHNIQUES [J].
SHIAU, JY ;
RASMUSSEN, ST ;
PHELPS, AE ;
ENLOW, DH ;
WOLF, GR .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1993, 72 (09) :1291-1297
[9]  
Shigley J. E., 1980, MECH ENG DESIGN
[10]   A CRITIQUE OF BOND STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS [J].
VANNOORT, R ;
NOROOZI, S ;
HOWARD, IC ;
CARDEW, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1989, 17 (02) :61-67