Entanglement-free heisenberg-limited phase estimation

被引:506
作者
Higgins, B. L.
Berry, D. W.
Bartlett, S. D.
Wiseman, H. M.
Pryde, G. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Ctr Quantum Dynam, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Quantum Comp Technol, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Griffith Univ, Ctr Quantum Comp Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature06257
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Measurement underpins all quantitative science. A key example is the measurement of optical phase, used in length metrology and many other applications. Advances in precision measurement have consistently led to important scientific discoveries. At the fundamental level, measurement precision is limited by the number N of quantum resources (such as photons) that are used. Standard measurement schemes, using each resource independently, lead to a phase uncertainty that scales as 1/root N-known as the standard quantum limit. However, it has long been conjectured(1,2) that it should be possible to achieve a precision limited only by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, dramatically improving the scaling to 1/N (ref. 3). It is commonly thought that achieving this improvement requires the use of exotic quantum entangled states, such as the NOON state(4,5). These states are extremely difficult to generate. Measurement schemes with counted photons or ions have been performed with N <= 6 (refs 6 - 15), but few have surpassed the standard quantum limit(12,14) and none have shown Heisenberg-limited scaling. Here we demonstrate experimentally a Heisenberg-limited phase estimation procedure. We replace entangled input states with multiple applications of the phase shift on unentangled single-photon states. We generalize Kitaev's phase estimation algorithm(16) using adaptive measurement theory(17-20) to achieve a standard deviation scaling at the Heisenberg limit. For the largest number of resources used ( N=378), we estimate an unknown phase with a variance more than 10 dB below the standard quantum limit; achieving this variance would require more than 4,000 resources using standard interferometry. Our results represent a drastic reduction in the complexity of achieving quantum-enhanced measurement precision.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / U5
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity
[2]   Adaptive homodyne measurement of optical phase [J].
Armen, MA ;
Au, JK ;
Stockton, JK ;
Doherty, AC ;
Mabuchi, H .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (13)
[3]   Optimal states and almost optimal adaptive measurements for quantum interferometry [J].
Berry, DW ;
Wiseman, HM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 85 (24) :5098-5101
[4]   Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states [J].
Bollinger, JJ ;
Itano, WM ;
Wineland, DJ ;
Heinzen, DJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1996, 54 (06) :R4649-R4652
[5]   QUANTUM-MECHANICAL NOISE IN AN INTERFEROMETER [J].
CAVES, CM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1981, 23 (08) :1693-1708
[6]   Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement [J].
Cook, Robert L. ;
Martin, Paul J. ;
Geremia, J. M. .
NATURE, 2007, 446 (7137) :774-777
[7]  
DAVISON AC, 1997, BOOTSTRAP METHODS TH, pCH5
[8]   Quantum methods for clock synchronization: Beating the standard quantum limit without entanglement [J].
de Burgh, M ;
Bartlett, SD .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2005, 72 (04)
[9]   Measurement of the photonic de Broglie wavelength of entangled photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion [J].
Edamatsu, K ;
Shimizu, R ;
Itoh, T .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (21) :213601-213601
[10]   Multiphoton path entanglement by nonlocal bunching [J].
Eisenberg, HS ;
Hodelin, JF ;
Khoury, G ;
Bouwmeester, D .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2005, 94 (09)