Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of voice and speech quality -: A study of patients with laryngeal cancer treated with laryngectomy vs irradiation

被引:26
作者
Finizia, C
Dotevall, H
Lundström, E
Lindström, J
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Phoniatr, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archotol.125.2.157
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare voice and speech function in patients who underwent laryngectomy with that of 2 control groups. Design: A cross-sectional study comparing acoustic and temporal variables with perceptual evaluations in 3 subject groups. Setting: University hospital in Goteborg, Sweden. Subjects: Two groups of patients with laryngeal carcinoma were examined: 12 male patients who had laryngectomy and were using a tracheoesophageal prosthesis and 12 male patients treated with radical radiotherapy who had a preserved larynx. The third group consisted of 10 normal controls without laryngeal disease. Main Outcome Measures: Acoustic variables were fundamental frequency, absolute fundamental frequency perturbation, speech rate, and maximum phonation time. Perceptual evaluation included 15 listeners' perceptual evaluation and the patients' self-assessment of speech intelligibility, voice quality, and speech acceptability. Results: No significant acoustic or temporal differences were found between the laryngectomy and radical radiotherapy groups. There was a significant difference between the patient groups in perceptual evaluation. Both groups of patients differed from normal controls in acoustic and temporal measures, where the laryngectomy group generally deviated more from the normal controls than the patient group treated with radiotherapy. There was a weak, but significant, correlation between absolute fundamental frequency perturbation and perceived voice quality. Conclusions: Perceptual evaluations could indicate significant differences between the patients who underwent laryngectomy and irradiated patients, where the acoustic analysis failed to reflect these differences. Both patient groups could be distinguished according to acoustic and temporal measures when compared with normal controls. The acoustic analyses were more sufficient in voices without severe dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF VOICE PRODUCTION AFTER RADIATION-THERAPY FOR STAGE-1 SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE GLOTTIS [J].
LEHMAN, JJ ;
BLESS, DM ;
BRANDENBURG, JH .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1988, 98 (02) :121-129
[12]   Perturbation and hoarseness: A pilot study of six children's voices [J].
McAllister, A ;
Sederholm, E ;
Ternstrom, S ;
Sundberg, J .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1996, 10 (03) :252-261
[13]  
MCGUIRT WF, 1994, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V120, P951
[14]   VOCAL QUALITY 10 YEARS AFTER RADIOTHERAPY FOR EARLY GLOTTIC CANCER [J].
MORGAN, DAL ;
ROBINSON, HF ;
MARSH, L ;
BRADLEY, PJ .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 39 (03) :295-296
[15]   SELECTED ACOUSTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PATHOLOGIC AND NORMAL SPEAKERS [J].
MURRY, T ;
DOHERTY, ET .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1980, 23 (02) :361-369
[16]   COMPARING RELIABILITY OF PERCEPTUAL RATINGS OF ROUGHNESS AND ACOUSTIC MEASURES OF JITTER [J].
RABINOV, CR ;
KREIMAN, J ;
GERRATT, BR ;
BIELAMOWICZ, S .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 38 (01) :26-32
[17]   PRIMARY RADIOTHERAPY FOR TREATING ALL LARYNGEAL-CANCER - A DISTRICT HOSPITAL EXPERIENCE [J].
REDDY, KTV ;
VINAYAK, BC ;
JEFFERIS, AF ;
WALLACE, M .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1993, 107 (05) :434-436
[18]   A COMPARATIVE ACOUSTIC STUDY OF NORMAL, ESOPHAGEAL, AND TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL SPEECH PRODUCTION [J].
ROBBINS, J ;
FISHER, HB ;
BLOM, EC ;
SINGER, MI .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1984, 49 (02) :202-210
[19]  
SANDERSON RJ, 1993, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V18, P181
[20]  
SINGER MI, 1983, LARYNGOSCOPE, V93, P1454