Early experience with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo kidney transplant recipients

被引:5
作者
Chang, HR
Lin, CC
Lian, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Inst Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Inst Biochem & Biotechnol, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.105
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and the gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Methods. This noncontrolled, retrospective review includes 22 de novo kidney transplant recipients. All patients received a standard course of basiliximab and were maintained on triple-drug therapy with EC-MPS, cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA), and prednisolone. The follow-up lasted 7.9 +/- 1.2 months. The incidence of GI adverse effects were compared with those of historical mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) studies. Results. The serum creatinine was maintained within 1.4 +/- 0.7 mg/dL. The 2-hour CsA postdose level was 1080 +/- 327 ng/mL initially and gradually tapered to 851 435 ng/mL. The daily EC-MPS dose was 1404 +/- 180 mg initially and gradually tapered to 1098 +/- 288 mg. The GI adverse effects at the daily dose of EGMPS 1422 +/- 126 mg included dyspepsia 27%, acid regurgitation 18.2%, epigastralgia 9%, nausea 9%, vomiting 4.5%, and poor appetite 4.5%. In comparison those from historical MMF 2 g/d studies included dyspepsia 3.1% to 40%, epigastralgia 10%, nausea 3.7% to 34%, and vomiting 0.6% to 10.7%. Conclusion. Immunosuppression with CsA, EGMPS, and steroids maintains stable graft functions. Minimal dose reduction of EGMPS decreases GI adverse events but without significance. EC-MPC and MMF have respective GI side effects; they can be used alternatively in patients with individual GI intolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:2066 / 2068
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Enteric coating of mycophenolate sodium: A rational approach to limit topical gastrointestinal lesions and extend the therapeutic index of mycophenolate [J].
Bjarnason, I .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) :3238-3240
[2]   Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium can be safely administered in maintenance renal transplant patients: Results of a 1-year study [J].
Budde, K ;
Curtis, J ;
Knoll, G ;
Chan, L ;
Neumayer, HH ;
Seifu, Y ;
Hall, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (02) :237-243
[3]   Cytomegalovirus infection and abdominal pain with mycophenolate mofetil - Is there a link? [J].
Gallaher, H ;
Andrews, PSA .
DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 24 (06) :405-412
[4]  
HAKEMI M, 2004, TRANSPLANT P, V34, P2091
[5]   General considerations of immunosuppressive therapies - Efficacy versus toxicity [J].
Helderman, JH .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (3A) :2S-3S
[6]   Mycophenolate mofetil dose reduction and the risk of acute rejection after renal transplantation [J].
Knoll, GA ;
MacDonald, I ;
Khan, A ;
Van Walraven, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 (09) :2381-2386
[7]  
MOURAD G, 2004, NORVATIS ASIAN TRANS
[8]  
Nankivell Brian J., 2003, New England Journal of Medicine, V349, P2326, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa020009
[9]   Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients [J].
Salvadori, M ;
Holzer, H ;
de Mattos, A ;
Sollinger, H ;
Arns, W ;
Oppenheimer, F ;
Maca, J ;
Hall, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (02) :231-236