The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels

被引:419
作者
Weijters, Bert [1 ]
Cabooter, Elke [2 ]
Schillewaert, Niels [1 ]
机构
[1] Vlerick Leuven Gent Management Sch, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Rating scale format; Response styles; Number of response categories; Response category labels; MARKETING-RESEARCH; LIKERT-SCALE; ATTITUDE; RELIABILITY; ALTERNATIVES; CHOICE; IMPACT; ACQUIESCENCE; COMPONENTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Questionnaires using Likert-type rating scales are an important source of data in marketing research. Researchers use different rating scale formats with varying numbers of response categories and varying label formats (e.g., 7-point rating scales labeled at the endpoints, fully labeled 5-point scales, etc.) but have few guidelines when selecting a specific format. Drawing from the literature on response styles, we formulate hypotheses on the effect of the labeling of response categories and the number of response categories on the net acquiescence response style, extreme response style and misresponse to reversed items. We test the hypotheses in an online survey (N=1207) with eight experimental conditions and a follow-up study with two experimental conditions (N=226). We find evidence of strong effects of scale format on response distributions and misresponse to reversed items, and we formulate recommendations on the choice of a scale format. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 247
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[61]   RATING-SCALES - NUMERIC VALUES MAY CHANGE THE MEANING OF SCALE LABELS [J].
SCHWARZ, N ;
KNAUPER, B ;
HIPPLER, HJ ;
NOELLENEUMANN, E ;
CLARK, L .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1991, 55 (04) :570-582
[62]   Assessing generalizability of scales used in cross-national research [J].
Sharma, S ;
Weathers, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2003, 20 (03) :287-295
[63]   CHOICE BASED ON REASONS - THE CASE OF ATTRACTION AND COMPROMISE EFFECTS [J].
SIMONSON, I .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1989, 16 (02) :158-174
[64]   THE METRIC QUALITY OF ORDERED CATEGORICAL-DATA [J].
SRINIVASAN, V ;
BASU, AK .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (03) :205-230
[65]   International market segmentation: issues and perspectives [J].
Steenkamp, JBEM ;
Ter Hofstede, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2002, 19 (03) :185-213
[66]   The meanings of branded products: A cross-national scale development and meaning assessment [J].
Strizhakova, Yuliya ;
Coulter, Robin A. ;
Price, Linda L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2008, 25 (02) :82-93
[67]   Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed Likert items [J].
Swain, Scott D. ;
Weathers, Danny ;
Niedrich, Ronald W. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2008, 45 (01) :116-131
[68]  
Tourangeau R., 2000, The psychology of survey response, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511819322
[69]  
Velez P., 2007, SURV RES METHODS-GER, P69, DOI DOI 10.18148/SRM/2007.V1I2.76
[70]   The impact of the number of scale points, dispositional factors, and the status quo decision heuristic on scale reliability and response accuracy [J].
Weathers, D ;
Sharma, S ;
Niedrich, RW .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (11) :1516-1524