HOW BAD IS ANTIDUMPING? EVIDENCE FROM PANEL DATA

被引:63
作者
Egger, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Nelson, Douglas [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, CESifo, Ifo Inst Econ Res, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Nottingham, Leverhulme Ctr Res Globalisat & Econ Policy, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Tulane Univ, Murphy Inst, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; GRAVITY EQUATION; MEMBERS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1162/REST_a_00132
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Current research on antidumping suggests a number of channels through which antidumping affects the volume of world trade. This paper uses a structural approach to the gravity model framework to evaluate these hypotheses using data on trade volume over the period 1948 to 2001. We conclude that the volume and welfare effects have been negative but quite modest.
引用
收藏
页码:1374 / 1390
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[13]  
Bernhofen D.M., 1996, Rev. Int. Econ., V4, P90
[14]   Intra-industry trade and strategic interaction: Theory and evidence [J].
Bernhofen, DM .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 45 (01) :77-96
[15]   PRICE DUMPING IN INTERMEDIATE GOOD MARKETS [J].
BERNHOFEN, DM .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 39 (1-2) :159-173
[16]  
BESELER JF, 1986, ANTIDUMPING ANTISUBS
[17]  
Blonigen B., 2003, HDB INT TRADE, P251
[18]   Antidumping investigations and the pass-through of antidumping duties and exchange rates [J].
Blonigen, BA ;
Haynes, SE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (04) :1044-1061
[19]   Antidumping and retaliation threats [J].
Blonigen, BA ;
Bown, CP .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 60 (02) :249-273
[20]  
Bown C. P., 2009, EFFECTIVE CRISIS RES, P91