HOW BAD IS ANTIDUMPING? EVIDENCE FROM PANEL DATA

被引:63
作者
Egger, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Nelson, Douglas [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, CESifo, Ifo Inst Econ Res, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Nottingham, Leverhulme Ctr Res Globalisat & Econ Policy, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Tulane Univ, Murphy Inst, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; GRAVITY EQUATION; MEMBERS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1162/REST_a_00132
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Current research on antidumping suggests a number of channels through which antidumping affects the volume of world trade. This paper uses a structural approach to the gravity model framework to evaluate these hypotheses using data on trade volume over the period 1948 to 2001. We conclude that the volume and welfare effects have been negative but quite modest.
引用
收藏
页码:1374 / 1390
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   Trade deflection and trade depression [J].
Bown, Chad P. ;
Crowley, Meredith A. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 72 (01) :176-201
[22]  
Bown CP., 2006, EUR J POLIT ECON, V22, P696
[23]  
Chamberlain Gary, 1984, HDB ECONOMETRICS, V2, P1248
[24]  
Cheng IH, 2005, FED RESERVE BANK ST, V87, P49
[25]  
Deardorff A., 1998, The Regionalization of the World Economy, P7, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226260228.003.0002
[26]  
DIXIT AK, 1977, AM ECON REV, V67, P297
[27]  
Falvey R., 2006, EUR J POLIT ECON, V22, P545
[28]  
Feenstra R., 2004, ADV INT TRADE THEORY
[29]   Exploring the intensive and extensive margins of world trade [J].
Felbermayr, Gabriel J. ;
Kohler, Wilhelm .
REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2006, 142 (04) :642-674
[30]  
Finger JM, 2006, SAFEGUARDS AND ANTIDUMPING IN LATIN AMERICAN TRADE LIBERALIZATION: FIGHTING FIRE WITH FIRE, P1