X-ray scattering in single- and dual-source CT

被引:65
作者
Engel, Klaus J. [1 ]
Herrmann, Christoph [1 ]
Zeitler, Guenter [1 ]
机构
[1] Philips Res Europe, Sector Med Imaging Syst, D-52066 Aachen, Germany
关键词
dual-source computed tomography; DSCT; cardiac CT; x-ray scattering; cross-scatter; Monte Carlo simulations; image quality; artifacts; scatter-to-primary ratio; contrast; noise; contrast-to-noise ratio;
D O I
10.1118/1.2820901
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
For medical imaging applications, such as cardiac imaging, dual-source computed tomography (CT) improves the temporal resolution by the simultaneous use of two cone beams, which acquire twice as many projections as single-source CT does within the same time interval. Besides this advantage, a drawback of such a system is additional x-ray scatter originating from the extra (cross-illuminating) cone beam. In this work, a comparison with single-source CT images is performed under same-dose conditions for two different thorax phantoms, and for different cone beam angles corresponding to a coverage of 20, 40, 80, and 160 mm on the rotation axis (z coverage). As a general result, the HU-magnitude of scatter-induced streak and cupping artifacts scale almost proportional to the illuminated volume. In dual-source CT, cross scatter induces a further factor of almost 2 in the scaling of artifacts in comparison to single-source CT. For all examined systems, the scatter-induced noise reduces the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In the case of an ideal scatter correction, the CNR is reduced even more, but contrast and CNR can be restored by an additional x-ray dose. With a 32-slice single-source CT (z overage of 20 mm) taken as a reference, a corresponding dual-source CT requires 7% more dose to maintain the same CNR. A CT system with a z coverage of 40, 80, and 160 mm requires 8%, 23%, and 54% more dose in a single-source configuration, respectively, and 20%, 47%, and 102% more dose in a dual-source configuration, respectively. In conclusion, a dual-source CT is comparable to a single-source CT with twice the z coverage concerning image degradation by scatter. (c) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 332
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Geant4 developments and applications [J].
Allison, J ;
Amako, K ;
Apostolakis, J ;
Araujo, H ;
Dubois, PA ;
Asai, M ;
Barrand, G ;
Capra, R ;
Chauvie, S ;
Chytracek, R ;
Cirrone, GAP ;
Cooperman, G ;
Cosmo, G ;
Cuttone, G ;
Daquino, GG ;
Donszelmann, M ;
Dressel, M ;
Folger, G ;
Foppiano, F ;
Generowicz, J ;
Grichine, V ;
Guatelli, S ;
Gumplinger, P ;
Heikkinen, A ;
Hrivnacova, I ;
Howard, A ;
Incerti, S ;
Ivanchenko, V ;
Johnson, T ;
Jones, F ;
Koi, T ;
Kokoulin, R ;
Kossov, M ;
Kurashige, H ;
Lara, V ;
Larsson, S ;
Lei, F ;
Link, O ;
Longo, F ;
Maire, M ;
Mantero, A ;
Mascialino, B ;
McLaren, I ;
Lorenzo, PM ;
Minamimoto, K ;
Murakami, K ;
Nieminen, P ;
Pandola, L ;
Parlati, S ;
Peralta, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2006, 53 (01) :270-278
[2]
[Anonymous], 1989, 44 ICRU
[3]
Barrett H., 1996, RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING
[4]
BERTRAM M, 2006, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V6142, P1
[5]
Bruder H, 2006, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V6142, P1
[6]
NOISE DUE TO PHOTON-COUNTING STATISTICS IN COMPUTED X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY [J].
CHESLER, DA ;
RIEDERER, SJ ;
PELC, NJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1977, 1 (01) :64-74
[7]
Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT [J].
Endo, M ;
Tsunoo, T ;
Nakamori, N ;
Yoshida, K .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) :469-474
[8]
Magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter in a 256-slice CT scanner [J].
Endo, Masahiro ;
Mori, Shinichiro ;
Tsunoo, Takanori ;
Miyazaki, Hiroaki .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (09) :3359-3368
[9]
PRACTICAL CONE-BEAM ALGORITHM [J].
FELDKAMP, LA ;
DAVIS, LC ;
KRESS, JW .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (06) :612-619
[10]
First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system [J].
Flohr, TG ;
McCollough, CH ;
Bruder, H ;
Petersilka, M ;
Gruber, K ;
Süss, C ;
Grasruck, M ;
Stierstorfer, K ;
Krauss, B ;
Raupach, R ;
Primak, AN ;
Küttner, A ;
Achenbach, S ;
Becker, C ;
Kopp, A ;
Ohnesorge, BM .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) :256-268