Detection of bacteria in platelet concentrates: comparison of broad-range real-time 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction and automated culturing

被引:58
作者
Mohammadi, T
Pietersz, RNI
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CMJE
Savelkoul, PHM
Reesink, HW
机构
[1] Sanquin Blood Bank NW Reg, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Med Microbiol & Infect Control, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04258.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, a broad-range 16S rDNA assay was validated and its performance was compared to that of an automated culture system to determine its usefulness for rapid routine screening of platelet concentrates (PCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The presence of bacteria in pooled PCs was routinely assessed in an automated culturing system (BacT/ALERT, bioMerieux). The PCR assay was performed with DNA extracted from the same samples as used for culturing. DNA extraction was performed with a automated extraction system (MagNA Pure, Roche Diagnostics). PCR amplification was performed with a set of universal primers and probe targeting eubacterial 16S rDNA. RESULTS: A total of 2146 PCs were tested. Eighteen (0.83%) samples were found to be contaminated. These samples were positive for the presence of bacteria by both methods. All contaminants were identified as bacteria belonging to the common human skin flora. These included Propionibacterium spp. (n = 7), Staphylococcus spp. (n = 6), Bacillus spp. (n = 2), Micrococcus spp. (n = 2), and Peptostreptococcus spp. (n = 1). Estimation of the bacterial load in PCs by real-time PCR showed that the initial levels of contamination varied between 13.6 and 9 x 10(4) colony-forming unit equivalents per PCR procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to culture in the BacT/ALERT system, the PCR assay had a sensitivity of 100 percent and a specificity of 100 percent. This real-time PCR assay has a much shorter turnaround time of 4 hours, which offers the possibility to test and obtain results on PCs before release or the day they are transfused. This would permit the withdrawal of contaminated PCs before transfusion.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 736
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Blajchman MA, 1997, TRANSFUSION, V37, pS295
[2]   Improving the bacteriological safety of platelet transfusions [J].
Blajchman, MA ;
Goldman, M ;
Baeza, F .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2004, 18 (01) :11-24
[3]   Evaluation of an automated culture system for detecting bacterial contamination of platelets: an analysis with 15 contaminating organisms [J].
Brecher, ME ;
Means, N ;
Jere, CS ;
Heath, D ;
Rothenberg, S ;
Stutzman, LC .
TRANSFUSION, 2001, 41 (04) :477-482
[4]   Evaluation of a new generation of culture bottle using an automated bacterial culture system for detecting nine common contaminating organisms found in platelet components [J].
Brecher, ME ;
Heath, DG ;
Hay, SN ;
Rothenberg, SJ ;
Stutzman, LC .
TRANSFUSION, 2002, 42 (06) :774-779
[5]   Monitoring of apheresis platelet bacterial contamination with an automated liquid culture system: a university experience [J].
Brecher, ME ;
Hay, SN ;
Rothenberg, SJ .
TRANSFUSION, 2003, 43 (07) :974-978
[6]   Determination of the degree of bacterial contamination of whole-blood collections using an automated microbe-detection system [J].
de Korte, D ;
Marcelis, JH ;
Soeterboek, AM .
TRANSFUSION, 2001, 41 (06) :815-818
[7]   Bacterial contamination of blood products: Factors, options, and insights [J].
Depcik-Smith, ND ;
Hay, SN ;
Brecher, ME .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2001, 16 (04) :192-201
[8]   Real time quantitative PCR [J].
Heid, CA ;
Stevens, J ;
Livak, KJ ;
Williams, PM .
GENOME RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (10) :986-994
[9]   Mechanisms of severe transfusion reactions [J].
Kopko, PM ;
Holland, PV .
TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2001, 8 (03) :278-281
[10]   Operational feasibility of routine bacterial monitoring of platelets [J].
Macauley, A ;
Chandrasekar, A ;
Geddis, G ;
Morris, KG ;
McClelland, WM .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 2003, 13 (04) :189-195