Postwar development in the Asian NICs: Does the neoliberal model fit reality?

被引:26
作者
Brohman, J
机构
[1] Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby
关键词
development; Asian NICs; neoliberalism; state; internal conditions; external factors;
D O I
10.2307/144262
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Neoliberal explanations of development in the Asian newly industrializing countries (NICs) typically overlook a number of key factors, including the activist role of the state, the emphasis on inward-oriented as well as outward-oriented development, and the unusual advantages offered by particular geographic and historical conditions. Rather than conforming to the neoliberal model of free trade and laissez-faire, the Asian NICs more closely resemble guided market economies in which an activist state has pursued policies of economic nationalism and classical Listian mercantilism. This raises doubts not only about the neoliberal depiction of NIC development, but also about the appropriateness and transferability of the neoliberal model of NIC development for other Third World countries.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 130
页数:24
相关论文
共 105 条
[71]  
List F., 1841, NATL SYSTEM POLITICA
[72]  
Luedde-Neurath R., 1986, IMPORT CONTROLS EXPO
[73]   WAS LATIN-AMERICA TOO RICH TO PROSPER - STRUCTURAL AND POLITICAL OBSTACLES TO EXPORT-LED INDUSTRIAL-GROWTH [J].
MAHON, JE .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1992, 28 (02) :241-263
[74]   ASSESSING ECONOMIC-GROWTH IN THE ASIAN NICS [J].
NOLAN, P .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ASIA, 1990, 20 (01) :41-63
[75]   NEW ECONOMIC THINKING IN LATIN-AMERICA [J].
OCAMPO, JA .
JOURNAL OF LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES, 1990, 22 :169-182
[76]  
Ogle George., 1990, S KOREA DISSENT EC M
[77]  
OMAN CP, 1991, POSTWAR EVOLUTION DE
[78]  
ONIS Z, 1991, COMP POLIT, V24, P109, DOI 10.2307/422204
[79]   WOMEN AND DEVELOPMENT - THE CASE OF SOUTH-KOREA [J].
PARK, KA .
COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 1993, 25 (02) :127-145
[80]   SOUTHEAST-ASIA GROWTH TRIANGLE - A SUBREGIONAL RESPONSE TO GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION [J].
PARSONAGE, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 16 (02) :307-317